2012
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1921-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the virtual-photon asymmetry A 2 and the spin-structure function g 2 of the proton

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(41 reference statements)
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last correction required calculating the polarization dependent inelastic radiative tail of the Bornlevel polarization-dependent cross sections, which form the measured asymmetry. However, numerical studies [19,22] with various models indicate the size of this radiative tail is small for most kinematics, reaching a few [23], E155 (filled up triangle) [24] , E155x (filled down triangle) [25], HERMES (up triangle) [26], and RSS (down triangle) [27] experiments for the virtual Compton scattering asymmetries A p 1 (top) and A p 2 (bottom). The lower band shows systematic uncertainty.…”
Section: (4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last correction required calculating the polarization dependent inelastic radiative tail of the Bornlevel polarization-dependent cross sections, which form the measured asymmetry. However, numerical studies [19,22] with various models indicate the size of this radiative tail is small for most kinematics, reaching a few [23], E155 (filled up triangle) [24] , E155x (filled down triangle) [25], HERMES (up triangle) [26], and RSS (down triangle) [27] experiments for the virtual Compton scattering asymmetries A p 1 (top) and A p 2 (bottom). The lower band shows systematic uncertainty.…”
Section: (4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusive DIS data sets considered in this analysis include polarization asymmetries of the proton, deuteron and 3 He measured at CERN in the EMC [1], SMC [30,31] and COMPASS [32,33] experiments, at SLAC with the E130 [34], E142 [35], E143 [36], E154 [37], E155 [38][39][40] and E155x [41] experiments, by the HERMES Collaboration [42][43][44] at DESY, as well as more recent experiments in Hall A [45,46] and Hall B [47,48] at Jefferson Lab.…”
Section: B Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HERMES p and d data are given in terms of the A ∥ asymmetry [42], while the earlier neutron data (extracted from 3 He) are given in terms of A 1 [43]. The more recent transverse polarization analysis [44] measured the A 2 asymmetry of the proton. For most of the SLAC experiments on p and d targets, both A ∥ and A ⊥ were measured; for 3 He targets, the earlier E142 experiment [35] presented results for A 1 and A 2 , while the later E154 experiment [37] provided A ∥ and A ⊥ .…”
Section: B Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data support (3.9) to a good accuracy [23][24][25]61], although especially at smaller x more stringent tests are not yet possible. Overall it has been estimated that the WW approximation for g 2 (x) and g a T (x) works with an accuracy of about 40 % or better [62].…”
Section: Tests Of Ww Approximation In Dis Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(3.9), for proton (P) and neutron (N) targets, and data from the SLAC E144 and E155 experiments at Q 2 = 7.1 GeV 2 [23,24]. Right panel: HERMES data for Q 2 > 1 GeV 2 with Q 2 = 2.4 GeV 2 [25]. The estimate of the theoretical uncertainty is described in the text.…”
Section: Tests Of Ww Approximation In Dis Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%