1969
DOI: 10.1063/1.1657351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Integrated X-Ray Intensities of Ge and Si

Abstract: The integrated Bragg intensities of the (111) reflections of perfect crystal Ge and Si have been measured with a higher accuracy than heretofore. Ge was measured using x-ray wavelengths of 0.56 and 1.54 Å, and Si using 1.54 Å. Comparison of the scattering factors so obtained with those measured previously by the same method or by the Pendellösung fringe method leads us to the conclusion that there is not a systematic difference between the two methods, as has been suggested. We find that the reflectivity in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There exists a noticeable difference between the value of F = 1.64 (3) (Fehlmann & Fujimoto, 1975) and both our results and those of DeMarco & Weiss (1965b), Colella & Merlini (1966), Jennings (1969), Roberto & Batterman (1970) and Alkire, Yelon & Schneider (1982). In our opinion, it may be explained as follows.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There exists a noticeable difference between the value of F = 1.64 (3) (Fehlmann & Fujimoto, 1975) and both our results and those of DeMarco & Weiss (1965b), Colella & Merlini (1966), Jennings (1969), Roberto & Batterman (1970) and Alkire, Yelon & Schneider (1982). In our opinion, it may be explained as follows.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The existence of this reflection is mainly due to asymmetry in the bonding charge and, to a lesser degree, to anharmonic thermal vibrations. The data reported for the Si 222 reflection were obtained predominantly by measuring the integrated intensity of diffracted X-rays (G/Sttlicher & W61fel, 1959;Renninger, 1960;DeMarco & Weiss, 1965a;Colella & Merlini, 1966;Hewat, Prager, Stephenson & Wagenfeld, 1969;Jennings, 1969;Roberto & Batterman, 1970;Rozenberg & Kleschinski, 1976) and y-rays (Alkire, Yelon & Schneider, 1982). The Pendell6sung technique has also been used (Fujimoto, 1974;Fehlmann & Fujimoto, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our interpretation is complicated by uncertainty about the size of the anharmonic correction to the data of Aldred & Hart (1973a) Hewat et al (1969) 0.11 De Marco & Weiss (1965) 0.180 (10) Roberto & Batterman (1970) 0.182 (5) Jennings (1969) 0.185 (4) Fujimoto (I 974) 0.188 (2) Colella & Merlini (1966) 0.192 Renninger (1960) 0. 194 Fehlmann & Fujimoto (1975) 0.206 (4) Cramb (1970) 0-22 (2) G6ttlicher & W61fel (1959) 0.223 Mean 0.188 (31) Weighted mean* 0-1896 (35) Indirect measurements Aldred & Hart (1973b) 0.169 ( 10 -12 erg A -3 obtained by Roberto et al (1974) at room temperature, compared with the reasonably constant value of fl ~ 2.7 x 10 -12 erg A -3 at the higher temperatures, suggests that the effective one-particle potential approximation is not good, at least for anharmonic terms, at room temperature and below.…”
Section: Anomalous-dispersion Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, although the integrated reflectivity of the analyzer is in principle a function of 2 0, in the present case this can be ignored since RY=2.4025 and cOS20AIRY=2"1084 do not differ too much. These values as well ~ts those of the other parameters were taken from the work by Jennings (1969). The resulting value of za@ at the Cu Ka wavelength is 9.013 × 10 -5.…”
Section: Ia= Clnl= 189 ×Losna(e/kev) -Amentioning
confidence: 99%