Permeability and Groundwater Contaminant Transport 1981
DOI: 10.1520/stp28316s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Hydraulic Conductivity of Fine-Grained Soils

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to review the state of the art in the measurement of hydraulic conductivity of fine-grained soils. Both field and laboratory tests for saturated and partially saturated soils are considered. For saturated soils, field tests are to be preferred because they permeate a larger volume of soil, thus taking into account the effects of macrostructure better than laboratory tests. Field tests are generally best performed by using a cylindrical piezometer tip, installed by me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
6

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
3
41
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Olson and Daniel, 1981), this small sample of hydraulic conductivity data shows good agreement between mean values and variances obtained from single-well pumping tests and laboratory tests of cores, although individual values do vary over a fairly wide range.…”
Section: B31 Spatial Variation (Vj) Measurement Noise (V2) and Stsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Olson and Daniel, 1981), this small sample of hydraulic conductivity data shows good agreement between mean values and variances obtained from single-well pumping tests and laboratory tests of cores, although individual values do vary over a fairly wide range.…”
Section: B31 Spatial Variation (Vj) Measurement Noise (V2) and Stsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…the bentonite studied here) is difficult with any technique (Gibson et al, 1967;Smiles and Rosenthal, 1968;Smiles, 1968;Kharaka and Smalley, 1976;Olson and Daniel, 1981). In this investigation, low hydraulic gradients are used for the determination of permeability to minimize the deformation of the samples during flow testing.…”
Section: Flow Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The constant flow rate method is not chosen for this study, mainly because this method is not suitable for high injection pressure flow tests, high temperature flow tests, and piping tests, because pressure/gradient is the critical independent variable. The transient flow methods are excluded from this investigation as they tend to yield lower permeability values than those obtained from the steady flow methods (Seaber and Vecchioli, 1966;Olson and Daniel, 1981;. Permeability discrepancies between a steady flow test and transient flow tests of the Pierre Shale are reported by Neuzil (1986).…”
Section: Flow Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Units of the permeability equation are in cmA 2 but expressed in darcies by use of the conversion 1 darcy = 0.981 * 10"8 cm A 2 (Olsen and Daniel, 1981). Figure 13 shows the rather rapid decrease in permeability with respect to flow time observed for most nonfractured moderately to densely welded tuffs.…”
Section: Permeability Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%