1993
DOI: 10.3133/ofr92201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water permeability and related rock properties measured on core samples from the Yucca Mountain USW GU-3/G-3 and USW G-4 boreholes, Nevada Test Site, Nevada

Abstract: Core samples from the Yucca Mountain USW GU-3/G-3 and USW G-4 boreholes were measured for bulk density, grain density, porosity, resistivity, and water permeability as part of a comprehensive geologic investigation designed to determine the suitability of Yucca Mountain as a site for the containment of high-level radioactive waste products. The cores were selected at the drill sites so as to be representative of the major lithologic variations observed within stratigraphic units of the Paintbrush Tuff, Calico … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The welded Topopah Spring Tuff water-permeability values ranged from m2 with an average of approximately less than approximately 2.0 x by Anderson (1 99 1) were mostly from the Topopah Spring crystal-rich nonlithophysal zone, which is a zone of increased porosity (Buesch and others, 1996) and, therefore, apparently increased matrix permeability. The water-permeability values (Anderson,199 nonwelded tuff of the Paintbrush Group are as much as an order of magnitude greater than the Anderson (1994) and Flint (1990)…”
Section: Comparison Of Air-injection Permeability Values To Laboratory Permeability Valuesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The welded Topopah Spring Tuff water-permeability values ranged from m2 with an average of approximately less than approximately 2.0 x by Anderson (1 99 1) were mostly from the Topopah Spring crystal-rich nonlithophysal zone, which is a zone of increased porosity (Buesch and others, 1996) and, therefore, apparently increased matrix permeability. The water-permeability values (Anderson,199 nonwelded tuff of the Paintbrush Group are as much as an order of magnitude greater than the Anderson (1994) and Flint (1990)…”
Section: Comparison Of Air-injection Permeability Values To Laboratory Permeability Valuesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…More than 90% of water pumped from the tuffs in the Crater Flat Group commonly emanates from the densely welded and fractured intervals, which are typically located in the central section of a particular unit. In addition, permeability measurements from pumping tests are several orders of magnitude larger than matrix permeability (Anderson, 1991;Anderson, 1994;Geldon, 1993;Lahoud et al, 1984;Rush et al, 1984), indicating that flow is primarily through fractures.…”
Section: Hydrogeologic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sonnenthal et al (1997) analyzed fracture frequency and fracture lengths in the Exploratory Studies Facility (ESF) tunnel in the unsaturated zone to calculate fracture porosity. Their estimates range from 10-5 to 10- 4 . Matrix porosity beneath the water table was measured from core samples and generally ranges between 0.20 and 0.30 (Anderson, 1991;Anderson, 1994;Geldon, 1993;Lahoud et al, 1984;Rush et al, 1984;Thordarson, 1983).…”
Section: Hydrogeologic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%