1990
DOI: 10.1063/1.103842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the gain saturation spectrum in InGaAsP diode lasers

Abstract: Measurement of relaxation resonance, damping, and nonlinear gain coefficient from the sidebands in the field spectrum of a 1.3 μm InGaAsP distributed feedback laser Appl.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gain compression coefficient is calculated with Equation 6to be E = 1.1 x lo-l7 cm3. The mrtttudes of E found in published experiments on bulk laser diode are (i) 7 x lo-cm3 to 6.7 x lo-l7 cm3 [2, 221 (from the frequency response); (ii) lo-l7 cm3 [23] (from subpicosecond gain dynamics); (iii) 5.4 x 10-l' cm3 [24] (using a parasitic-free optical modulation technique); and (iv) 1.2 x lOpi7 cm3 [25] (by measuring the intensity modulation spectra of current-modulated Fabry-Perot lasers). The experimental values of E for quantum-well lasers are (i) -3 x lo-l7 cm3 [26,271 (from the frequency response); (ii) 4.3 x lo-r7 cm3 [28] (by studying nondegenerate four-wave mixing); and (iii) 2.45 to 7.34 x lo-r7 cm3 [29] (by relative intensity noise measurements).…”
Section: Gain Saturation Simulationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The gain compression coefficient is calculated with Equation 6to be E = 1.1 x lo-l7 cm3. The mrtttudes of E found in published experiments on bulk laser diode are (i) 7 x lo-cm3 to 6.7 x lo-l7 cm3 [2, 221 (from the frequency response); (ii) lo-l7 cm3 [23] (from subpicosecond gain dynamics); (iii) 5.4 x 10-l' cm3 [24] (using a parasitic-free optical modulation technique); and (iv) 1.2 x lOpi7 cm3 [25] (by measuring the intensity modulation spectra of current-modulated Fabry-Perot lasers). The experimental values of E for quantum-well lasers are (i) -3 x lo-l7 cm3 [26,271 (from the frequency response); (ii) 4.3 x lo-r7 cm3 [28] (by studying nondegenerate four-wave mixing); and (iii) 2.45 to 7.34 x lo-r7 cm3 [29] (by relative intensity noise measurements).…”
Section: Gain Saturation Simulationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Not only on the laser frequency, the distribution function of carriers changes from the equilibrium Fermi distribution function in the on-lasing state, which is known as kinetic "hole-burning". It is an interesting question to ask how the hole-burning effect is modified in presence of both the strong light-matter and Coulomb interactions, and will be helpful in understanding mechanisms of the gain saturation [5,6] in case of the microcavity laser.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%