2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.92.015211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the EMC effect in the deuteron

Abstract: We have determined the structure function ratio R The observed EMC effect for these kinematics is consistent with conventional nuclear physics models that include off-shell corrections, as well as with empirical analyses that find the EMC effect proportional to the probability of short-range nucleon-nucleon correlations.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solid line (black) is the fit to the black points for 0.35 < x B < 0.7. From (Griffioen et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Deuteron Imc Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solid line (black) is the fit to the black points for 0.35 < x B < 0.7. From (Griffioen et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Deuteron Imc Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the broad range of predictions, such studies indicate that nuclear effects in the deuteron are non-negligible and rise rapidly in the region of large Bjorken x. A recent direct measurement of nuclear effects in the deuteron [30] indicates a few-percent negative correction at x ∼ 0.5-0.6, with a steep rise at large x. Therefore, if neglected or treated incorrectly, these nuclear effects can potentially introduce significant uncertainties and/or biases in the extraction of the neutron structure functions and of the d quark distribution from the DIS data [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the nuclear corrections in the deuteron structure function are small and usually are neglected in calculations. This fact is checked in the recent studies of the EMC effect in the deuteron by Griffioen et al [80] through analyzing the recently published CLAS data at Jefferson Lab [73]. However, we recalculated thed(x) −ū(x) considering the nuclear corrections in the deuteron but only for the last data point that its related R d EMC (= 1.07) is comparatively large, see Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, we recalculated thed(x) −ū(x) considering the nuclear corrections in the deuteron but only for the last data point that its related R d EMC (= 1.07) is comparatively large, see Ref. [80]. We found that it changes the result by 10% so that the negativity of data at large-x is still remaining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%