2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of stressful postures during daily activities: An observational study with older people

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39,51,57 Previous studies have used a variety of devices for postural monitoring. 4,13,18,48,58 A common problem found in postural-monitoring devices used during daily activities is the trade-off between portability and accuracy of measurements. Instruments such as the moment T T STUDY DESIGN: Feasibility randomized controlled trial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,51,57 Previous studies have used a variety of devices for postural monitoring. 4,13,18,48,58 A common problem found in postural-monitoring devices used during daily activities is the trade-off between portability and accuracy of measurements. Instruments such as the moment T T STUDY DESIGN: Feasibility randomized controlled trial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research performed by other scientists, showed, that stressful posture can decrease ability to tolerate physical work load and it can lead to a fatigue level increase, which in turn determines every day activities and tasks performance diminution. Specific tasks, during which stressful posture can appear, should be noticed and directed by physiotherapists to the specific correction and stress decrease methods, for everyday activities and performance improvement (Seidel D., 2011). For children without dysarthria fatigue level was statistically insignificantly higher among the boys then for the girls p>0,05, children have less muscle mass then adult, thus are able to generate less absolute power during high intensity work load performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the measurement system on one participant. We employed the ISO standard because it has been used with the CUELA system in earlier research (Freitag et al, 2007; Seidel et al, 2011). In addition, CUELA has been demonstrated to have good validity and reliability in field studies (Ellegast, 1998).…”
Section: Test Designmentioning
confidence: 99%