2008
DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2008.207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Stiffness Index by Digital Volume Pulse Analysis Technique: Clinical Utility in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification

Abstract: Noninvasive measurements of arterial stiffness may aid the optimal stratification of CVD risk in an apparently healthy population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
33
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within subject variability of the SI using the Pulse Trace device was 3.5% in this study and comparable to the findings reported by Gunarathne et al 20 (5.4%). As measurement of the SI with the Pulse Trace device is operator-independent, inter-observer variability of the SI was neither assessed in the current nor in the study by Gunarathne et al 20 Comparable within subject variability of the AIx assessed by the Sphygmocor device has been reported by Wilkinson et al 21 (5.3%) and Siebenhofer et al 22 (6.4%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within subject variability of the SI using the Pulse Trace device was 3.5% in this study and comparable to the findings reported by Gunarathne et al 20 (5.4%). As measurement of the SI with the Pulse Trace device is operator-independent, inter-observer variability of the SI was neither assessed in the current nor in the study by Gunarathne et al 20 Comparable within subject variability of the AIx assessed by the Sphygmocor device has been reported by Wilkinson et al 21 (5.3%) and Siebenhofer et al 22 (6.4%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As measurement of the SI with the Pulse Trace device is operator-independent, inter-observer variability of the SI was neither assessed in the current nor in the study by Gunarathne et al 20 Comparable within subject variability of the AIx assessed by the Sphygmocor device has been reported by Wilkinson et al 21 (5.3%) and Siebenhofer et al 22 (6.4%). Using the operator index of the Sphygmocor device to assure consistency of waveforms the inter-observer variability was found to be 7.5% in a recent study by Wassertheurer et al 23 We found a modest correlation between the digital SI and the peripheral and central AIx derived by arterial applanation tonometry.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…All of the measurements were performed by the same operator. Intraobserver variation (coefficient of variation) of the repeated measurements of arterial stiffness in the same subject on the same day and 6 weeks later was 5.4% and 7.4%, respectively, 25 …”
Section: Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Measurement Protocolmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The DVP analysis method is a noninvasive technique of measuring pulse wave reflections to determine the arterial stiffness peripherally. 24 Arterial stiffness using this has been proven to be a validated, reproducible technique 25 with minimal intraobserver variation. 29 The stiffness index derived from this method has been demonstrated to have a good correlation to pulse wave velocity, 26 whereas the sensitivity and specificity of this technique are comparable to the pulse wave velocity method in the identification of patients with latent cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: Measurements Of Arterial Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arterial stiffness measured using digital volume pulse (DVP) analysis has been proved to be validated and reproducible technique with minimal intraobserver variation [7] and is a more sensitive tool in risk stratification for CVD in comparison to plasma glucose, total cholesterol, and waist to hip ratio in apparently healthy population [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%