1984
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/208.1.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of relative oscillator strengths for Mn I. Transitions from levels in the range 0 eV <   <   3 eV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
43
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that our oscillator strengths for the transitions from the z 6 P • J levels agree, to within the uncertainty, with the previous UV and visible measurements by Booth et al (1984). There is also a good agreement with our laboratory log(g f ) values for the transitions from the z 6 P • J levels and the semiempirical calculated log(g f ) values of Kurucz & Bell (1995).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen that our oscillator strengths for the transitions from the z 6 P • J levels agree, to within the uncertainty, with the previous UV and visible measurements by Booth et al (1984). There is also a good agreement with our laboratory log(g f ) values for the transitions from the z 6 P • J levels and the semiempirical calculated log(g f ) values of Kurucz & Bell (1995).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There is also a good agreement with our laboratory log(g f ) values for the transitions from the z 6 P • J levels and the semiempirical calculated log(g f ) values of Kurucz & Bell (1995). The measured log(g f ) values for UV transitions from the z 4 P • J levels agree with both Booth et al (1984) and Kurucz & Bell (1995) to within the uncertainties. However, the semi-empirical log(g f ) values of Kurucz & Bell (1995) for IR transitions from the z 4 P • J levels are approximately 30% (0.12 dex where the unit dex is log 10 of the ratio of the two values) stronger than our values.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The large photospheric -meteoritic difference may be due to unaccounted uncertainties in the photospheric calculations introduced by the different techniques used to determine oscillator strengths in previous laboratory measurements. Blackwell & Collins (1972) and Booth et al (1984a) both used absorption techniques to determine oscillator strengths. In particular, Booth et al (1984a) quotes uncertainties as low as 3 per cent, but Booth's uncertainties have been been independently moderated in the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA) atomic spectra database to be of the order of 10 to 20 per cent, see Fuhr & Wiese (2003).…”
Section: Laboratory Oscillator Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blackwell & Collins (1972) and Booth et al (1984a) both used absorption techniques to determine oscillator strengths. In particular, Booth et al (1984a) quotes uncertainties as low as 3 per cent, but Booth's uncertainties have been been independently moderated in the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA) atomic spectra database to be of the order of 10 to 20 per cent, see Fuhr & Wiese (2003). Greenlee & Whaling (1979) used emission spectroscopy to determine oscillator strengths, and their measurements include many of the transitions relevant to our current study of the solar photosphere, but the uncertainty in their oscillator strengths is of the order 25 per cent.…”
Section: Laboratory Oscillator Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%