2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2014.7025154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of perceived spatial resolution in 3D light-field displays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each run has (a) a picture-type graphic problem, (b) a text-type math problem, (c) a video-type counting problem. the user takes 12 minutes to answer six questions, he or she is then subjected to a tumbling E eye exam [21] (Fig. 3(e)).…”
Section: Verification By User Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each run has (a) a picture-type graphic problem, (b) a text-type math problem, (c) a video-type counting problem. the user takes 12 minutes to answer six questions, he or she is then subjected to a tumbling E eye exam [21] (Fig. 3(e)).…”
Section: Verification By User Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement methodologies of visualization quality on a more objective level (i.e., angular resolution of a display system) are given by the International Display Measurement Standard [27]. The related publications of Kovács et al [28] [29] [30] investigate both subjective and objective quality of light field visualization, with emphasis on spatial and angular resolution [31] [32] [33]. In this paper, angular resolution refers to the content itself, which is the ratio of the number of source views and the utilized FOV of the display, as stated in Section I.…”
Section: Perceived Quality Of Light Field Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This applies to the experiments of Cserkaszky et al [15] [16] and Darukumalli et al [17] as well. As a counter example, Kovacs et al [18] used 2.7H. Greater viewing distances did appear in literature, but smaller ones not even once, due to the front-projection nature of the system.…”
Section: Static Scene Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%