1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf02524740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of non‐randomness in spatial distributions

Abstract: Summary The measurement of departure from randomness in spatial distributions has widespread application in ecological work. Several “indices of non‐randomness” are compared with regard to their dependence on sample number, sample size and density. Criteria for the best choice of index for specific situations are discussed. A new coefficient Cx is proposed for use with positively contagious distributions and tests of significance are given. When Cx and another index (S2/m−1) are used for positive and negative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
161
0
14

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
161
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…To study the degree of aggregation of the mites, we used the following indices of aggregation: variance/mean ratio (I) (RABINOvICH, 1980) (GREEN, 1966), and k parameter of negative binomial distribution (BLISS and FISHER, 1953;SOuTHWOOD, 1978;ELLIOT, 1979), calculated using the maximum likelihood method. The data were tested for fit with Poisson and negative binomial distributions using the chi-square goodness-of-fit test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To study the degree of aggregation of the mites, we used the following indices of aggregation: variance/mean ratio (I) (RABINOvICH, 1980) (GREEN, 1966), and k parameter of negative binomial distribution (BLISS and FISHER, 1953;SOuTHWOOD, 1978;ELLIOT, 1979), calculated using the maximum likelihood method. The data were tested for fit with Poisson and negative binomial distributions using the chi-square goodness-of-fit test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative values indicate a uniform distribution. Positive, small values indicate a random distribution, and values close to one indicate maximum contagion (Green, 1966). C x is determined using the following formula:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A) Mean Daily Discharge (MDD) in the River Garonne between January 1994 and May 2000, with B) MDD for the period prior to and after the spate on 14-15 September 1998 (the double arrows indicate the 24-h sampling periods on 7-8 and 23-24 September 1998). Green's (1966) index, which is considered the only such index that is little influenced by differences in sample number (Elliot 1977) : ID = (s 2 I -)-1/n I --1, where s 2 is the variance, I -is the mean and n is the number of samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para este índice, valores negativos indicam padrão de distribuição uniforme, enquanto valores positivos indicam padrão agregado (Green 1966). Baseia-se na razão variância/média da distribuição e é dado por: Valores negativos indicam distribuição uniforme, valores baixos e positivos (k < 2), disposição altamente agregada, valores variando de dois a oito, agregação moderada e valores superiores a oito distribuição aleatória (Elliott 1979).…”
Section: íNdice De Morisitaunclassified