1977
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.119.5.1727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of IgD by a Double Antibody Radioimmunoassay: Demonstration of an Apparent Trimodal Distribution of IgD Levels in Normal Human Sera

Abstract: A double antibody radioimmunoassay (RIA) was developed to measure IgD in serum and secretions. One IgD myeloma protein was used as radiolabeled antigen and standard with antiserum to a second IgD myeloma protein. The IgD standard and normal sera yielded parallel inhibition curves in the RIA and inhibition was produced by IgD and not by any of the other immunoglobulins. The assay had a lower limit of sensitivity of 0.01 International Unit (I.U.)/ml and modifications increased the sensitivity to 0.0008 I.U./ml. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serum levels of IgD have been measured previously by a number of methods and found to vary widely between individuals. Studies of healthy individuals have reported ranges of 0.15 to 300 μg/ml (Dunnette et al, 1977) and 0.10 to 213 μg/ml (Levan-Petit et al, 2000). IgD levels follow a non-gaussian distribution, which has been reported as unimodal (Levan-Petit et al, 2000), bimodal (Litzman et al, 1997), and trimodal (Dunnette et al, 1977).…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Serum levels of IgD have been measured previously by a number of methods and found to vary widely between individuals. Studies of healthy individuals have reported ranges of 0.15 to 300 μg/ml (Dunnette et al, 1977) and 0.10 to 213 μg/ml (Levan-Petit et al, 2000). IgD levels follow a non-gaussian distribution, which has been reported as unimodal (Levan-Petit et al, 2000), bimodal (Litzman et al, 1997), and trimodal (Dunnette et al, 1977).…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RID is much less sensitive than RIA or ELISA (sensitivity ∼1.25 to 3 μg/ml), and the method does not allow for the handling of large numbers of samples. RIA is more sensitive (Dunnette et al, 1977), but involves the use of radioactively labeled compounds, which does not allow easy handling of large numbers of samples.…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation