47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2009
DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Hypersonic Boundary Layer Transition on Cone Models in the Free-Piston Shock Tunnel HIEST

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These amplification values are high as compared to the more typical value of N ≈ 5-6 usually characterizing a 'noisy' tunnel (Schneider 2001), but consistent with the expected difference in receptivity for the high-frequency second-mode instability as compared to the relatively low-frequency noise in the T5 free stream as measured by Parziale et al (2014). This is supported by the recent analysis of Gronvall, Johnson & Candler (2014), who found a transition onset value of N ∼ 8 for the shock-tunnel experiments of Tanno et al (2009).…”
Section: Focused Laser Differential Interferometrysupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These amplification values are high as compared to the more typical value of N ≈ 5-6 usually characterizing a 'noisy' tunnel (Schneider 2001), but consistent with the expected difference in receptivity for the high-frequency second-mode instability as compared to the relatively low-frequency noise in the T5 free stream as measured by Parziale et al (2014). This is supported by the recent analysis of Gronvall, Johnson & Candler (2014), who found a transition onset value of N ∼ 8 for the shock-tunnel experiments of Tanno et al (2009).…”
Section: Focused Laser Differential Interferometrysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is in contrast to the harsh mechanical environment of reflected-shock tunnels like T5. However, given the success of past efforts (Adam & Hornung 1997;Germain & Hornung 1997;Rasheed et al 2002) in T5, as well as other researchers using shock tunnels (Tanno et al 2009;Laurence et al 2012Laurence et al , 2014a to study stability and transition, we felt confident that measurement solutions could be found.…”
Section: Measurement Of Second-mode Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parziale et al [25] found that noise in the T5 freestream was relatively low frequency compared with the most unstable boundary-layer frequencies. This hypothesis was implicitly supported by the recent analysis of Gronvall et al [28], who found a transition onset value of N ≈ 8 for the experiments of Tanno et al [12], which were also performed in a reflected-shock tunnel, although at lower enthalpy than the present study, and for a limited range of conditions, with unspecified cleaning procedures. At the start of the present test campaign, before the implementation of the cleaning regimen, we encountered difficulty in achieving repeatable transition Reynolds numbers and N factors.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…One such ground-test facility to generate "high-enthalpy" flows is the reflected-shock tunnel. In the past, researchers have used shock tunnels and reflected-shock tunnels to study BLT [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. More recently, in the high-enthalpy reflected-shock tunnel at Gottingen, Germany (HEG), Laurence et al [14][15][16] reported a schlieren-based technique for the investigation of disturbances in hypervelocity boundary layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other measurements have since been made with these sensors in multiple tunnels under noisy and quiet flow. [7][8][9] These sensors show promise for being able to measure boundary-layer instabilities in many hypersonic wind tunnels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%