The Boeing/AFOSR Mach-6 Quiet Tunnel achieved quiet flow to a stagnation pressure of 163 psia in Dec. 2008, the highest value observed so far. It remains quiet at pressures above 160 psia. Under noisy conditions, nozzle-wall boundary-layer separation and the associated tunnel shutdown appear to propagate slowly upstream, whereas under quiet conditions, the propagation is very rapid. A new diffuser insert has been designed, fabricated, and installed in the tunnel in order to start larger blunt models and increase run time. A flared cone with a circular-arc geometry was designed to generate large second-mode N factors under quiet flow conditions. When the computed N factor was 13, large instability waves were measured under quiet flow conditions using fast pressure sensors, but the flow remained laminar. Transition was observed only under noisy conditions. A laminar instability was detected in the wake of an isolated roughness element in the boundary layer on the nozzle wall; this appears to be the first such measurement at hypersonic speeds.

The Boeing/AFOSR Mach-6 Quiet Tunnel has achieved quiet flow to stagnation pressures of 146 psia, and intermittently quiet flow between 146 and 169 psia. In an attempt to measure natural transition under quiet flow, a 3-m-circular-arc compression cone was tested with a nearly sharp nosetip. Using temperature-sensitive paint, hot streaks were observed to develop near the rear of the cone at high pressures under quiet flow. The streaks do not appear under noisy flow. The cause of the hot streaks remains unknown, though they may be instabilities or artifacts of nonlinear breakdown. Under quiet flow, the cone boundary layer remained laminar up to N factors of at least 15 and possibly as high as 19. Transition occurred at N = 9 under noisy flow. It is unknown why laminar flow persisted to such high N factors. As part of an investigation of crossflow vortices, a 7 • half-angle cone was tested at 6 • angle of attack with temperature-sensitive paint finishes of varying roughness. The roughness of the paint finish was observed to have an effect on crossflow vortices, in some cases inducing transition under noisy flow. Heat-transfer measurements were made at the stagnation point of a hemisphere to observe the effect of freestream noise; no effect was evident.

High-frequency pressure-fluctuation measurements were made in AEDC Tunnel 9 at Mach 10 and the NASA Langley 15-Inch Mach 6 and 31-Inch Mach 10 tunnels. Measurements were made on a 7 •-half-angle cone model. Pitot measurements of freestream pressure fluctuations were also made in Tunnel 9 and the Langley Mach-6 tunnel. For the first time, second-mode waves were measured in all of these tunnels, using 1-MHz-response pressure sensors. In Tunnel 9, second-mode waves could be seen in power spectra computed from records as short as 80 µs. The second-mode wave amplitudes were observed to saturate and then begin to decrease in the Langley tunnels, indicating wave breakdown. Breakdown was estimated to occur near N ≈ 5 in the Langley Mach-10 tunnel. The unit-Reynolds-number variations in the data from Tunnel 9 were too large to see the same processes. In Tunnel 9, the measured transition locations were found to be at N = 4.5 using thermocouples, and

Experiments have been carried out in the NASA Langley Research Center 20-Inch Mach 6Wind Tunnel to measure the freestream pressure fluctuations, or tunnel noise, using a pitot rake. These experiments are part of an on-going effort to characterize the freestream disturbances of the Langley hypersonic wind tunnels along with other facilities around the country. Once the freestream disturbances have been characterized, a better understanding of the effect of these disturbances on boundary layer instability and transition measurements can be gained. The current experiments use a multi-probe pitot rake instrumented with both Kulite and PCB pressure transducers. Data were obtained over a range of Reynolds numbers and test section axial and radial positions. In general, noise levels were consistent spatially across the test section and ranged from 1% at the highest Reynolds numbers tested to approximately 1.6% at the lowest Reynolds number tested.

No abstract