2020
DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2020.1736200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of heat transfer coefficients for steam condensation on a vertical 21.5-mm-O.D. tube in the presence of air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is shown that, on average, a 40.2% higher mass of water is collected on the dynamic SLIPS than on the nonactuated SLIPS. From the condensate mass accumulation rate calculated from Figure (f), we used the mass collection method as a means to measure heat flux indirectly. To calculate the heat flux of dynamic SLIPSs, the mass increasing rate is multiplied by the latent heat of condensation for water (2.26 MJ/kg) and normalized by the condensing surface area (17.35 cm 2 ) of the device. Therefore, the heat flux of the dynamic SLIPS ( q ″ E ) for the 12 kV AC with D = 1/3 is 1.35 kW/m 2 , while the heat flux of the nonactuated SLIPS ( q ″ 0 ) is 0.96 kW/m 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown that, on average, a 40.2% higher mass of water is collected on the dynamic SLIPS than on the nonactuated SLIPS. From the condensate mass accumulation rate calculated from Figure (f), we used the mass collection method as a means to measure heat flux indirectly. To calculate the heat flux of dynamic SLIPSs, the mass increasing rate is multiplied by the latent heat of condensation for water (2.26 MJ/kg) and normalized by the condensing surface area (17.35 cm 2 ) of the device. Therefore, the heat flux of the dynamic SLIPS ( q ″ E ) for the 12 kV AC with D = 1/3 is 1.35 kW/m 2 , while the heat flux of the nonactuated SLIPS ( q ″ 0 ) is 0.96 kW/m 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, Lee et al [116] have discovered that the length of the condenser tube can have a substantial effect on condensation heat transfer under natural convection, as evidenced by their prior research. It has been highlighted that notable variations in the collected data can arise across different facilities, primarily attributed to In a study conducted by Kim et al [120], an investigation was undertaken to explore the impact of tube diameter on the HTC during condensation. They found that reducing the tube diameter from 40 mm to 21.5 mm resulted in an average increase of 62% in condensation HTC across a range of air mass fractions from 0.1 to 0.8.…”
Section: Separate Effect Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%