2007
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/61/1/011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of friction coefficients with the atomic force microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slopes of the linear least square fits in both cases yield the coefficient of friction to be 0.24. This is in general agreement with the coefficient of friction reported for Muscovite mica in the literature [21], [29]- [31]. However, it is worth mentioning that the linear dependence of friction on normal force is only an approximate description.…”
Section: B Measurement Of 3-d Tip-sample Interaction Forcessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The slopes of the linear least square fits in both cases yield the coefficient of friction to be 0.24. This is in general agreement with the coefficient of friction reported for Muscovite mica in the literature [21], [29]- [31]. However, it is worth mentioning that the linear dependence of friction on normal force is only an approximate description.…”
Section: B Measurement Of 3-d Tip-sample Interaction Forcessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, noticing that θ x (y i ) = V y (y i )/k phx (y i ), (29) and (30) can be employed to obtain the constants k phx (y i )(i = 1, 2) as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the near future, we plan to address the current low force and low stiffness limitations of TLFC with much softer microfabricated TRL devices. (2) This paper demonstrates that the TLFC method itself is no more involved than an ordinary friction measurement and should not impede broad adoption by outside user groups who have access to a calibrated device. We will consider fabricating, calibrating, and distributing TRL devices to outside groups upon request.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1 and 2 gives k AFM = 119.9 ± 0.1 N/m and C AFM = 2.25 ± 0.01 μN/V. 2 The experimentally observed uncertainties in the lateral stiffness and force calibration constant were 0.1% and 0.4%, respectively. The measured lateral stiffness of 120 N/m is consistent with the calculated expected range of 110-500 N/m.…”
Section: High Load Afm With Custom Colloidal Probesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation