2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1012453205740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Differences in Red Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthetic Activity between Sun and Shade Leaves by Fluorescence Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of our results indicated shade adaptation in red leaves (see reviews by Anderson 1986, Lambers et al 1998and Lichtenthaler et al 2000. For example, red leaves of P. cerasifera were thinner and had a lower LMA, stomatal frequency, chl a:b ratio and area-based net photosynthetic rate, and a considerably reduced apparent carboxylation efficiency compared with green leaves (Tables 1, 2 and 5 and Figure 2).…”
Section: Properties Of Red Leaves Are Partly Compatible With the Classupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Some of our results indicated shade adaptation in red leaves (see reviews by Anderson 1986, Lambers et al 1998and Lichtenthaler et al 2000. For example, red leaves of P. cerasifera were thinner and had a lower LMA, stomatal frequency, chl a:b ratio and area-based net photosynthetic rate, and a considerably reduced apparent carboxylation efficiency compared with green leaves (Tables 1, 2 and 5 and Figure 2).…”
Section: Properties Of Red Leaves Are Partly Compatible With the Classupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Because the impact of CMV on leaf physiology was minor compared to powdery mildew and CGMMV, and healthy leaves were exposed to natural senescence processes, no significant differences could be found on the last assessment date. Given that chlorophyll fluorescence is an indicator for photosynthetic efficiency (Lichtenthaler et al ., ), this is a preferable method to destructive chlorophyll extraction for the assessment of plant vitality. This was affirmed by Bürling et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the 'vitality index' RFd was rather similar between GFP-expressing and control leaves, being 97.0% the value of controls in the transformed variant. Although it is pointed out by Roháček (2002) that the interpretation of RFd is controversial, because it requires knowledge of principal Chl fluorescence parameters, it has been used successfully in ecophysiological studies as a measure of photosynthetic activity or has been linked to CO2 assimilation rates (Lichtenthaler et al 1984(Lichtenthaler et al , 2000Lichtenthaler 1990). If interpreted in the latter respect, the RFd values correspond well with the lack of any effect of GFP on yield and growth of plants in field experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%