Measurement of Course Evaluation for Lecturers of the Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment

Ihsan, Ahmad Kamal Ariffin Mohd; Taib, Kamaruddin Abu; Talib, Meor Zainal Meor; Abdullah, Shahrir; Husain, Hafizah; Wahab, Dzuraidah Abd; Idrus, Rosafizah Mohamed; Abdul, Nasrul Amir

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.391

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When information collected on the professors' qualities, the methods should be carefully taken in account of as described in [13]. Feedback from the students is considered a problem of classification set [69].…”

Section: ) Challenges On Tools and Methods Of Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Seventh class is Others that has a single study (1/56) which is a report explained in [68]. Last class is Developments that includes largest portion of articles (19/56) [3], [6], [7], [9], [10], [69]- [76]. Application of study implemented Fuzzy ELECTRE method [12].…”

Section: ) Education Domainmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The study [78] has contributed a model to improve the HRs performance through university assessment, or higher education as in [72], or to increase the lecturers' understanding towards research [43]. Measurement of course evaluation for lecturers will make improvements on the teaching and learning methods [69]. In addition, it can be improved the teaching quality by programs of pedagogical university training [55].…”

Section: Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Inspection into the Criteria of Lecturer Performance in Educational Domain

Al-Masri

Drus²,

Al-Dalaien

2019

IJEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper is to survey researchers’ efforts in response to the most number of criteria of lecturers’ performance into various domains, connecting the research insights from the literature into a consistent taxonomy, and figuring out the gaps on this vital research area. The fundamental search is relating to 1) personnel evalaution especially lecturer; 2) education-related; 3) criteria and applications (methods). Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and IEEE Xplore are reliable sources that can cover education and technical literature. The final number of studies is 78. Five articles are reviews to characterize the evaluation criteria for specific specializations. An another group (73/78) is research articles that include diverse evaluation criteria and domains. Most domains covered criteria, such as knowledge, skills, experience, and qualification.

show abstract

Section: ) Challenges On Tools and Methods Of Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: ) Education Domainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Systematic Inspection into the Criteria of Lecturer Performance in Educational Domain

Al-Masri

Drus²,

Al-Dalaien

2019

IJEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Lecturers are the pillars of excellence for the institution where their role has a high impact on the quality of teaching and learning (Ihsan et al, 2012). In order to assess the quality of teaching and learning from that aspect, there is a wide range of instruments in use to collect students' feedbacks, both qualitative and quantitative (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another question that always comes up is connected to the level of honesty of students 'answers and the willingness of them to take part in any kind of evaluation process (Ihsan et al, 2012).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges In Course Evaluations At Budapest University Of Technology And Economics

Tóth¹,

Surman²,

Árva³

2017

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Students evaluate course quality aspects both at the end of the semester and right after student performance evaluations the results of which often do not correspond. The research question attempts to show if there is a significant difference between end of the term course evaluations and evaluation results given right after the midterm tests and exams. The purpose of the study is to investigate how students perceive ways and methods of student performance evaluations and related lecturer-student interactions by analysing correlations between end of the term course evaluations and immediate evaluations. The impact of peer evaluations on end of the term course evaluations are also discussed. The research method was built on correlations between the overall course evaluations and the results of student evaluations given in the framework of the peer review program are determined and evaluated. Differences between average evaluations were also investigated. All data was obtained based on statistical analysis. The courses can be identified in case of which there are significant differences between evaluations given by the same group of students at the end of the semester and right after student performance evaluation sessions. We also highlight how student performance evaluations contribute to overall course evaluations.The results of the conducted statistical analyses pinpoint the need for restructuring the course evaluation questionnaire and the reconsideration of the role of peer evaluations concerning lecturer-student interactions .

show abstract

Applying a fuzzy questionnaire in a peer review process

Jónás

Tóth

Árva

2018

Total Quality Management & Business Excellence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper introduces the application and the results of a fuzzy number based questionnaire used for evaluating lecturers' performance in a newly launched peer review programme in order to enhance the reliability of peer evaluations. In our approach, the membership function of the fuzzy number is composed of an increasing and a decreasing sigmoid membership function conjuncted by Dombi's intersection operator. Compared to the traditional Likert scale-based evaluation, the proposed fuzzy number based methodology allows peer reviewers to express their uncertainty and the variability of the reviewed lecturer's performance within a single lecture and during a semester in a quantitative way. By utilising the principles of Dombi's Pliant Arithmetic, fuzzy Likert scale based evaluations given by peer reviewers can be cumulated by aggregating the parameters of the left-and right-hand sides of the fuzzy numbers separately. This property results in a much simpler statistical analysis of the gathered data than the methods previously proposed in the literature. A demonstrative case study illustrates our main contributions in peer evaluation.

show abstract

Measurement of Course Evaluation for Lecturers of the Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment

Cited by 6 publications

References 1 publication

A Systematic Inspection into the Criteria of Lecturer Performance in Educational Domain

A Systematic Inspection into the Criteria of Lecturer Performance in Educational Domain

Challenges In Course Evaluations At Budapest University Of Technology And Economics

Applying a fuzzy questionnaire in a peer review process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About