2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2004)130:9(879)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Coarse Gravel and Cobble Transport Using Portable Bedload Traps

Abstract: Portable bedload traps ͑0.3 by 0.2 m opening͒ were developed for sampling coarse bedload transport in mountain gravel-bed rivers during wadable high flows. The 0.9 m long trailing net can capture about 20 kg of gravel and cobbles. Traps are positioned on ground plates anchored in the streambed to minimize disturbance of the streambed during sampling. This design permits sampling times of up to 1 h, overcoming short-term temporal variability issues. Bedload traps were tested in two streams and appear to collect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
137
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
137
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations in measured bedload have been attributed to fluctuations occurring over several scales, including individual particle movement (Bunte 2004), the passing of bedforms others 1989, 1990), the presence of bedload sheets (Whiting and others 1988), and larger pulses or waves of stored sediment (Reid and Frostick 1986). As a result, rates of bedload transport can exhibit exceptionally high variability, often up to an order of magnitude or greater for a given discharge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations in measured bedload have been attributed to fluctuations occurring over several scales, including individual particle movement (Bunte 2004), the passing of bedforms others 1989, 1990), the presence of bedload sheets (Whiting and others 1988), and larger pulses or waves of stored sediment (Reid and Frostick 1986). As a result, rates of bedload transport can exhibit exceptionally high variability, often up to an order of magnitude or greater for a given discharge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the two methods should yield comparable estimates of bed-load transport at higher flows, which are the focus of this study. However, Bunte et al ͑2004͒ show that bed-load rating curves for Helley-Smith samples tend to have lower slopes than those of traps. Because effective discharge calculations are sensitive to rating-curve slopes, differences in sampling methods may yield different estimates of the "observed" effective discharge, and thus different results of equation performance when comparing observed versus predicted effective discharges.…”
Section: Potential Error In Observed Transport Datamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, based on a number of simplifying assumptions, Hubbell and Stevens ͑1986͒ suggest a maximum probable error of 40% when using a Helley-Smith sampler to measure bed-load transport. Field studies by Bunte et al ͑2004͒ indicate that Helley-Smith samples may overestimate transport rates by 3-4 orders of magnitude at lower flows ͑Ͻ50% bankfull͒, but with transport rates converging toward those measured by fixed traps at higher flows. Hence, the two methods should yield comparable estimates of bed-load transport at higher flows, which are the focus of this study.…”
Section: Potential Error In Observed Transport Datamentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3). A similar technical solution (Colorado State University/Forest Service, CSU/FS bedload traps) was used by Bunte et al (2003Bunte et al ( , 2004, to determine bedload transport rate. According to Bunte and Abt (2009), samplers of the type (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%