Coastal Structures 2003 2004
DOI: 10.1061/40733(147)16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Armor Damage on Rubble Mound Structures: Comparison Between Different Methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyze armor damage in trunks and roundheads, Vidal et al (2003 and, Gómez-Martín and Medina (2006) displaced, Sv is more accurate than Sp; however, as the damage level increases, profile-based armor damage, Sp, is more reliable (see Vidal et al, 2003).…”
Section: Armor Damage Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To analyze armor damage in trunks and roundheads, Vidal et al (2003 and, Gómez-Martín and Medina (2006) displaced, Sv is more accurate than Sp; however, as the damage level increases, profile-based armor damage, Sp, is more reliable (see Vidal et al, 2003).…”
Section: Armor Damage Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Armor damage is usually calculated in terms of unit loss from the armor layer. AUE is the main failure mode used to describe armor erosion, and popular methods for measuring armor damage, such as armor profiling and visual unit counting (see Vidal et al, 2003), calculate AUE assuming constant armor porosity. ALS is usually related with steep slopes and/or insufficient friction with the under-layer.…”
Section: Armor Unit Extraction (Aue) and Armor Layer Sliding (Als) Famentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van der Meer (1988) summarized and Vidal et al (2003) comparatively studied these methodologies used for damage assessment given in Table 4.…”
Section: Damage Assessment Methodology and Damage Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative analysis of these methods of damage assessment can be seen in Vidal et al (2003). The damage figures presented in this paper are based on method 2.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%