2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1004-9541(08)60233-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and Correlation of Solubilities of Adipic Acid in Different Solvents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the solute of AA, its Δ T fus H and T fus can be obtained in the literature, which are 34900 J·mol –1 and 426.15 K, respectively, For the solute of GA, its Δ T fus H and T fus can be obtained in the literature, which are 20900 J·mol –1 and 369.15 K, respectively, For the solute of SA, its Δ fus H and T fus can be obtained in the literature, which are 32900 J·mol –1 and 458.15 K, respectively, and the mole gas constant R is 8.314 J·mol –1 ·K –1 . In this work, for the definition of the activity coefficient, the modified NRTL model would be adopted. ,, Because the activity coefficient depends on the mole fraction and temperature, so eq must be solved iteratively. To calculate the activity coefficient, the NRTL activity coefficient model was adopted in this work as where x i and γ i represent the mole fraction and the activity coefficient of component i , a ij and b ij are the parameters needed to be regressed, η ij was constant value 0.3, as Remon and Prausnitz proposed .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the solute of AA, its Δ T fus H and T fus can be obtained in the literature, which are 34900 J·mol –1 and 426.15 K, respectively, For the solute of GA, its Δ T fus H and T fus can be obtained in the literature, which are 20900 J·mol –1 and 369.15 K, respectively, For the solute of SA, its Δ fus H and T fus can be obtained in the literature, which are 32900 J·mol –1 and 458.15 K, respectively, and the mole gas constant R is 8.314 J·mol –1 ·K –1 . In this work, for the definition of the activity coefficient, the modified NRTL model would be adopted. ,, Because the activity coefficient depends on the mole fraction and temperature, so eq must be solved iteratively. To calculate the activity coefficient, the NRTL activity coefficient model was adopted in this work as where x i and γ i represent the mole fraction and the activity coefficient of component i , a ij and b ij are the parameters needed to be regressed, η ij was constant value 0.3, as Remon and Prausnitz proposed .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, for the definition of the activity coefficient, the modified NRTL model would be adopted. 16,26,27 Because the activity coefficient depends on the mole fraction and temperature, so eq 3 must be solved iteratively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While data analysis can be done manually, the PLS method provides equivalent quantitative results with 25 1.8 5.1% 36.5 26 -1.1 -3.1% 33.2 27 2.2 6.2% significantly less effort. Even low solubility (<10 mg/mL) values can be determined for solute/solvent combinations by using calibration curves created using other similar solvent mixtures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%