2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measles in Minsk, Belarus, 2001–2003: Clinical, virological and serological parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, measles IgG avidity assays have been used to classify primary (PVF) and secondary (SVF) vaccine failures (2,16,31,33). PVF are vaccinated individuals who never responded to the vaccine and present with classic measles upon measles virus infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, measles IgG avidity assays have been used to classify primary (PVF) and secondary (SVF) vaccine failures (2,16,31,33). PVF are vaccinated individuals who never responded to the vaccine and present with classic measles upon measles virus infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study from Minsk, only 21.4% (3/14) of adult patients demonstrated severe measles symptoms (Atrasheuskaya et al, 2005). The patients' age in that study ranged from 15 to 25 years and; 11/14 patients had a history of prior measles vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To the best of our knowledge, since 80’, no case of atypical measles syndrome has been reported in the literature. In contrast, non-classical measles that is characterised by a mild clinical presentation has been reported during outbreaks as a diagnosis challenge, mostly in vaccinated patients 13 14. Currently, the live-attenuated and combined measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is used and recommended since 1985 in Europe and the USA 1 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%