2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean and sensitivity estimation in optional randomized response models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
69
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article we are concerned with the utilization of auxiliary information in the estimation stage in simple random sampling without replacement (SRSWOR), making use of an optional randomized response model proposed by Gupta et al (2010). The underlying assumption is that the primary variable is sensitive in nature but a nonsensitive auxiliary variable exists that is positively correlated with the primary variable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this article we are concerned with the utilization of auxiliary information in the estimation stage in simple random sampling without replacement (SRSWOR), making use of an optional randomized response model proposed by Gupta et al (2010). The underlying assumption is that the primary variable is sensitive in nature but a nonsensitive auxiliary variable exists that is positively correlated with the primary variable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expressions for the bias and mean square error of the proposed estimator are obtained to first order of approximation. Efficiency comparisons with the ordinary optional randomized response technique (RRT) mean estimator of Gupta et al (2010) are carried out both theoretically and numerically. A simulation study is presented to evaluate the performance of the proposed estimator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expressions for the Bias and MSE of the proposed estimators (correct up to first order approximation) are derived. We compare the results of this new model with those of the split-sample based Optional Additive RRT Model of Kalucha et al (2015), Gupta et al (2015) and the simple optional additive RRT Model of Gupta et al (2010). We see that the regression estimator for the new model has the smallest MSE among all of the estimators considered here when they have the same sample size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Choice of scrambling mechanism plays an important role in quantitative response models. Eichhron and Hayre (1983), Gupta and Shabbir (2004), Gupta et al (2002Gupta et al ( , 2010, Wu et al (2008) and many others have estimated the mean of a sensitive variable when the study variable is sensitive and no auxiliary information is available. While Eichhron and Hayre (1983) have used multiplicative scrambling, Gupta et al (2010) have used additive scrambling in the context of optional randomized response models where a respondent provides a true response if he/she considers the question non-sensitive, and provides a scrambled response if the question is deemed sensitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A randomized device was used to collect the responses from the respondents and protected their privacy despite of getting direct response. After Warner, various randomized response models were used for estimating the proportion of the nominal variable in the population(see e.g., Greenberg et al (1969), Folsom et al (1973), Mangat and Singh (1990), Gupta et al (2010)). Greenberg et al (1971), Eichhorn and Hayre (1983), Mangat and Singh (1990), Gupta et al (2013) considered the simple and multistage scrambling models (MSM) for estimating the mean of sensitive variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%