2015
DOI: 10.3390/w7116190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mealworms for Food: A Water Footprint Perspective

Abstract: Abstract:In this paper, we have explored the possibility of substituting traditional meat products with an alternative source of protein (insects) in order to reduce human pressure on water. Insects, in fact, could represent a good alternative source of quality proteins and nutrients and they are already a very popular component of the diet of one third of the world's population in approximately 80% of countries. In the study, we have taken into account only two species of edible insects (Tenebrio molitor and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The method of choice for such assessments is the life cycle assessment (LCA), which has a supply chain approach that quantifies environmental impact of a product through the entire chain. To date, LCAs have only been published for mealworms, house crickets, black soldier flies, and houseflies (Oonincx and de Boer 2012; Miglietta et al 2015;Roffeis et al 2015;Van Zanten et al 2015;Smetana et al 2016, Halloran et al 2017.…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of choice for such assessments is the life cycle assessment (LCA), which has a supply chain approach that quantifies environmental impact of a product through the entire chain. To date, LCAs have only been published for mealworms, house crickets, black soldier flies, and houseflies (Oonincx and de Boer 2012; Miglietta et al 2015;Roffeis et al 2015;Van Zanten et al 2015;Smetana et al 2016, Halloran et al 2017.…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is urgently needed in order to establish its environmental impact v. other protein sources. Little is known about the water footprint; only one study indicates that it is more efficient to obtain protein from mealworms rather than from traditional farmed animals (121) . One of the major advantages is that a number of insect species can be reared on organic side streams.…”
Section: Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water footprint per edible ton of mealworms is 4341 m 3 /t, which is comparable to that of chicken meat and 3.5 times lower than that of beef ( Figure 1E) [25]. The energy used to produce 1 kg of fresh mealworms is similar to that used in the production of beef and pork, but the land area required was much less compared with beef, chicken and pork [26].…”
Section: Environmentally Sustainable Production For Human Foodmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The mass rearing of animals has a negative environmental impact by producing large amounts of greenhouse gas [23], de Vries and de Boer [24], Miglietta et al [25], Oonincx and de Boer [26], and Sánchez-Muros et al [27].…”
Section: Environmentally Sustainable Production For Human Foodmentioning
confidence: 99%