2021
DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mealtime behaviours of young children with sensory food aversions: An observational study

Abstract: Proper nutritional intake is imperative for successful development in early childhood (Samuel et al., 2018); however, many children are not consuming well-rounded diets due to selective eating (Carruth et al., 2004). Selective, or picky, eating has been defined in a variety of ways but includes an element of low dietary variety (Dovey et al., 2008). Among children, dietary selectivity is often based on the sensory characteristics of food, such as texture, smell or temperature. Approximately 50% of children dem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mealtime duration also decreased significantly, although it still took some children up to minutes to finish a meal. This length of time is consistent with other findings such as Caldwell and Krause’s (35) study, showing that children with sensory eating problems required between 8 and 26 minutes to finish a meal. Efficiency in oral skills (eg, not losing, pushing, or spitting food or liquid out of the mouth) increased during the participation in the “Graz model” of tube weaning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Mealtime duration also decreased significantly, although it still took some children up to minutes to finish a meal. This length of time is consistent with other findings such as Caldwell and Krause’s (35) study, showing that children with sensory eating problems required between 8 and 26 minutes to finish a meal. Efficiency in oral skills (eg, not losing, pushing, or spitting food or liquid out of the mouth) increased during the participation in the “Graz model” of tube weaning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Differences in socioeconomic status may affect the access of support to services for CWDS (e.g., cost and quality of medical and therapeutical services, Caldwell & Krause, 2021).…”
Section: Parental Modelling Of Feeding Behaviours Has Been Observedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Top-down interventions (Weinstock-Zlotnick & Hinojosa, 2004): Direct work with the picky eater, focusing on developing self-feeding skills, and exposure to different foods and textures (Howe & Wang, 2013) by engaging the child in food play (Caldwell & Krause, 2021). In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Nekitsing et al (2018) investigated successful strategies to enhance vegetable intake in preschool children aged 2-5 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some behaviours identified as ‘problematic’ in this study are consistent with those included under the picky eating umbrella. This study reported improvements in the child's problem eating; however, conclusions cannot be generalised to picky eating more specifically. Top‐down interventions (Weinstock‐Zlotnick & Hinojosa, 2004): Direct work with the picky eater, focusing on developing self‐feeding skills, and exposure to different foods and textures (Howe & Wang, 2013) by engaging the child in food play (Caldwell & Krause, 2021). In a systematic review and meta‐analysis, Nekitsing et al (2018) investigated successful strategies to enhance vegetable intake in preschool children aged 2–5 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%