Proceedings of the 42nd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1669112.1669172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

McPAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,884 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We estimate area overhead of the Swarm Core microarchitecture by using CMOS circuit area models in McPAT [10] and CACTI [11]. We assume affinity value is a 32-bit fixed point value and all registers in Run Queue Buffer except for Core Affinity is 64-bit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimate area overhead of the Swarm Core microarchitecture by using CMOS circuit area models in McPAT [10] and CACTI [11]. We assume affinity value is a 32-bit fixed point value and all registers in Run Queue Buffer except for Core Affinity is 64-bit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the memory footprints of the evaluated workloads (193 MB-1.6 GB) are smaller than DRAM cache size (16 GB), we scaled down DRAM cache size to a quarter of workload footprint for each simulation by reducing the number of rows per bank. The latency/energy parameters of processor (14 nm technology), DRAM, and PCM are extracted from a modified McPAT [19], Micron datasheet, and previous studies [10,17,18], respectively. We adopted PAR-BS [16] as a memory request scheduling policy and adaptive open/close policy (which is also adopted at Intel Xeonℱ series) as a DRAM/PCM page management policy.…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, we use CACTI to estimate the power and area of the three caches included in the accelerator. We employ the version of CACTI provided in McPAT [26], a.k.a. enhanced CACTI [27] which includes models for 28 nm.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%