2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00938-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

McIndoe procedure for vaginal agenesis: Long-term outcome and effect on quality of life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Surgical methods of neovaginal creation make oocyte retrieval more difficult than graded perineal dilatation. 12 A high lateral placement of ovaries has been described in patients with Müllerian agenesis who undergo oocyte retrieval for gestational carrier treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Surgical methods of neovaginal creation make oocyte retrieval more difficult than graded perineal dilatation. 12 A high lateral placement of ovaries has been described in patients with Müllerian agenesis who undergo oocyte retrieval for gestational carrier treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greft becomes epithelialized during the following period and covers the new forming vagina. Low morbidity and having no need to abdominal approach can be mentioned as advantages but also have disadvantages as worse cosmetic results at greft space, need of dilator usage after operation, stenosis in new vagina, need of lubricant use in intercourse (6,13) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean age at the time of presentation was 21.9 years (range: 18-24 years). Before surgery, all patients were informed about other available surgical and non-surgical procedures such as laparotomic sigmoid vaginoplasty, lining of the neovaginal space with a split-thickness skin graft according to McIndoe [11], creation of a neovagina using the patient's peritoneum as a lining (Davydov procedure) or conservative creation of a neovagina according to the method described by Frank [13]. In addition, all women underwent sonographic examination of the pelvis and the urinary system, and no further anomalies of the urinary tract or skeletal system were observed.…”
Section: Patient Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-surgical approaches include dilatation of the vaginal groove with a hand-held dilator in a squatting position first described by Frank [13,20] or by passive dilatation using the patient's own weight according to the method of Ingram [8]. In addition, various surgical methods have been described such as the creation of a split-thickness skin graft which covers a stent inserted into the space between bladder and rectum (McIndoe and Bannister) [11], the use of the patient's own peritoneum for vaginal reconstruction (Davydov technique) [5] or creation of a neovagina with a sigmoid graft [4]. Although there is no standardized method, the majority of surgically treated cases (up to 300) have been described by Vecchietti [18,19] who proposed a combination of the surgical and conservative approaches by performing a laparotomy, dissection of the vesico-rectal septum followed by fixation of a vaginal "dilatation olive" with two sutures passing from the abdominal wall through the pseudohymenal septum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%