2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MCDM-based multidimensional approach for selection of optimal groundwater pumping systems: Design and case example

Abstract: Herein, optimal groundwater pumping solutions based on a variety of energy resources and water storage options are estimated and classified. Each energy source and water storage option is first characterized considering energy, economic, and environmental criteria. A multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) process based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is subsequently applied to identify and classify the optimal groundwater p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the calculation process of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is relatively complicated. When there are too many groundwater samples or evaluation indicators, the calculation difficulty will geometrically increase, which is suitable for high-precision evaluation work [20]. e evaluation results of the random matrix model are similar to the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results, and the influence of each evaluation index on groundwater is also taken into consideration to reduce the influence of abnormal values on the evaluation results.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the calculation process of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is relatively complicated. When there are too many groundwater samples or evaluation indicators, the calculation difficulty will geometrically increase, which is suitable for high-precision evaluation work [20]. e evaluation results of the random matrix model are similar to the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results, and the influence of each evaluation index on groundwater is also taken into consideration to reduce the influence of abnormal values on the evaluation results.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That study recognized that there were correlations between the criteria and took account of this in assigning weights. Various options for pumping and storing groundwater were investigated by [156] using 5 main groups of criteria (economic (divided into five sub categories), energy, environmental, water loss, and social) [156]. A combination of methods, AHP (for weights) and TOPSIS for the ranking, was applied to a case study in Spain, that showed how the optimal energy source changed depending on the depth and extent of the aquifer.…”
Section: Focus On Water Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production of CO 2 : This criterion refers to the total amount of CO 2 emissions that should be avoided if the groundwater remediation or the mechanisms leads to it [12,25,26].…”
Section: Environmental Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%