2020
DOI: 10.4018/ijcini.2020040105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MCDM Approach for Mitigation of Flooding Risks in Odisha (India) Based on Information Retrieval

Abstract: Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) provides a suitable platform for groups as well as promotion of the participants' role in decision processes. This also enables the development of real participatory processes essential for the successful implementation and sustainable flood management programs. The present study contributes by applying two MCDM approaches for weighting the criteria related to the environmental impacts of flooding. Moreover, an attempt was made in this study by an extensive review of liter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, despite the fact that other MCDM methods have been developed, or the discovery of criteria estimates and picking in light of their tendencies, one of the most popular methods that utilize comparisons was already considered to be the BWM, with even fewer data requirements and more trustworthy comparability [62]. Rezaei et al [63] found that the BWM is appropriate when there are fewer criteria to be taken into consideration and that it also generates more consistent findings with fewer pair-wise comparisons [64]. The SWARA technique, which is another way of doing MCDM and is capable of handling a range of criteria in any challenging situation, has also proven its unique application for a variety of decision-making procedures [65][66][67].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, despite the fact that other MCDM methods have been developed, or the discovery of criteria estimates and picking in light of their tendencies, one of the most popular methods that utilize comparisons was already considered to be the BWM, with even fewer data requirements and more trustworthy comparability [62]. Rezaei et al [63] found that the BWM is appropriate when there are fewer criteria to be taken into consideration and that it also generates more consistent findings with fewer pair-wise comparisons [64]. The SWARA technique, which is another way of doing MCDM and is capable of handling a range of criteria in any challenging situation, has also proven its unique application for a variety of decision-making procedures [65][66][67].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khattak et al's (2016) study demonstrates the use of hydraulic models and the GIS to construct flood extent maps for a stretch of Pakistan's Kabul river. GIS approaches, HEC-RAS, and multi-criteria decision analysis are promising for developing realistic flood extent predictions that are more effective in flood risk zonation (Ouma & Tateishi 2014;Rahmati et al 2015;Mishra & Satapathy 2021). Based on literature reviews, it may be stated that combining hydrological and hydrodynamic models enhances flood hazard response and management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, another recently developed MCDM method called the best-worst method (MCDM-BWM) by Rezaei, 2015 [48] has received recognition for its simplicity of use and efficiency [49][50][51]. It has already found its applications in flood risk analysis [52], assessment of solid waste management practices [53], landslide susceptibility mapping [54], and suitable site selection problems, etc. [55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%