2017
DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2017.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maya mortuary landscapes, Central Belize

Abstract: The Central Belize Archaeological Survey (CBAS) was initiated in 2005 as a sub-project of the Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance project (BVAR; directed by Jaime Awe) to investigate the prehistoric Maya cemetery site of Caves Branch Rockshelter. Subsequently, we began to survey other nearby cave and rockshelter sites (Hardy 2009) and to excavate the monumental civic-ceremonial centre of Deep Valley (Jordan 2008). CBAS became an independent project in 2009, with an increasing focus on sites in the neig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of these individuals were completely articulated, though all scattered elements appear to originate from complete bodies. Thus, it seems likely that isolated bones were not redeposited in these features after initial deposition elsewhere, as has been documented in similar assemblages at other nearby cave and rockshelter sites (Wrobel, Michael, et al, ; Wrobel, Morton, Michael, Biggs, & Andres, ; Wrobel, Shelton, Morton, Lynch, & Andres, ; Wrobel, Tyler, & Hardy, , 2013). This is particularly apparent in Chamber 3, which holds the larger and better preserved of the two deposits (Feature 5) comprising nine complete individuals, rather than an assortment of random bones taken from another context (Figure ).…”
Section: The Archaeological Context Of Je'reftheelmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…None of these individuals were completely articulated, though all scattered elements appear to originate from complete bodies. Thus, it seems likely that isolated bones were not redeposited in these features after initial deposition elsewhere, as has been documented in similar assemblages at other nearby cave and rockshelter sites (Wrobel, Michael, et al, ; Wrobel, Morton, Michael, Biggs, & Andres, ; Wrobel, Shelton, Morton, Lynch, & Andres, ; Wrobel, Tyler, & Hardy, , 2013). This is particularly apparent in Chamber 3, which holds the larger and better preserved of the two deposits (Feature 5) comprising nine complete individuals, rather than an assortment of random bones taken from another context (Figure ).…”
Section: The Archaeological Context Of Je'reftheelmentioning
confidence: 60%