2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4371(01)00630-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maxwell's demon. (I) A thermodynamic exorcism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, there are no fast and slowparticles to be sorted out [27]. Ihope the preceding discussions will be helpful in changing this belief.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, there are no fast and slowparticles to be sorted out [27]. Ihope the preceding discussions will be helpful in changing this belief.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively,atnocost he is asked to reduce the entropyofthe gas he is manipulating butentropyisanondestructible property of matter [28]. But starting from as table equilibrium state there exist no states of lower energy and the same entropy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is one and only one situation when Shannon-Jaynes informational-entropy coincides with the physical entropy of Clausius in thermodynamics, namely, the case of strict equilibrium [188,[242][243][244]. We recall that the extremum-principle approach produces the well established equilibrium statistical mechanics, and is providing a satisfactory formalism for describing nonequilibrium systems in a most general form.…”
Section: Thermo-statistics Of Complex Structured Systems and Nesefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the work required to erase the information has been predicted to be as much gained by the thermal difference in the engine [18]. A more controversial explanation is that there are no faster and slower particles, they are all stationary [19] [20]. However, this is problematic as it is difficult to reconcile with observed Brownian motion.…”
Section: Theoretical Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%