2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00184-020-00767-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum product of spacings prediction of future record values

Abstract: A spacings-based prediction method for future upper record values is proposed as an alternative to maximum likelihood prediction. For an underlying family of distributions with continuous cumulative distribution functions, the general form of the predictor as a function of the estimator of the distributional parameters is established. A connection between this method and the maximum observed likelihood prediction procedure is shown. The maximum product of spacings predictor turns out to be useful to predict th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ( Ri ) ∞ i=1 is the sequence of upper record values in an iid sequence of standard exponential random variables. Reasoning as in Volovskiy and Kamps [14], we conclude that…”
Section: Point Predictionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where ( Ri ) ∞ i=1 is the sequence of upper record values in an iid sequence of standard exponential random variables. Reasoning as in Volovskiy and Kamps [14], we conclude that…”
Section: Point Predictionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Among others, Kaminsky and Rhodin [12] presented the maximum likelihood predictor (MLP) and Volovskiy and Kamps [13] introduced the maximum observed likelihood prediction (MOLP). Based on a Pareto distribution, the MLP and MOLP for upper record values were shown in Volovskiy and Kamps [14]. However, both methods share the disadvantage that neither the next upper nor the next lower record value can be predicted reasonably, since the methods lead to the last record as predictor of the next one.…”
Section: Point Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, the MPS technique has attracted great attention in data analysis due to its potential advantage over the classical ML procedure. For instance, Singh et al [21,22], Shao [23], El-Sherpieny et al [24], Volovskiy and Kamps [25], Kawanishi [26] have discussed the MPS method under various data types when the lifetime distributions were the Weibull, power Lomax, generalized inverted exponential, generalized power Weibull, Lindley and generalized Rayleigh models, respectively. Anatolyev and Kosenok [27] studied the invariance property of the MPS and stated that the MPSEs have more efficient properties than the MLEs for skewed distributions or in small sample cases for heavy-tailed distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%