2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.5642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum power extraction from a hydrokinetic energy conversion system

Abstract: Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems capture the power available in the water flowing in waterways. An electrical interface for the power takeoff of a hydrokinetic energy conversion system was designed and a control strategy for the maximum power extraction was investigated. A laboratory prototype was used for the experimental characterisation of the system. High efficiencies were observed because of the restricted flow conditions. The power curves obtained from the experimental results were used for the sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard P&O method is easy to implement; however, it is slow, causes oscillation around the MPP and is not resistant to signal noises. The proposed P&O techniques differ in the type of the disturbed variable, for, e.g., DC current [33], generator current [35] and speed [34,[36][37][38]45,46]. An interesting modification in the form of an adaptive perturbation level technique to eliminate oscillations around the MPP was presented in [36].…”
Section: Mppt Without Hydraulic Parameter Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard P&O method is easy to implement; however, it is slow, causes oscillation around the MPP and is not resistant to signal noises. The proposed P&O techniques differ in the type of the disturbed variable, for, e.g., DC current [33], generator current [35] and speed [34,[36][37][38]45,46]. An interesting modification in the form of an adaptive perturbation level technique to eliminate oscillations around the MPP was presented in [36].…”
Section: Mppt Without Hydraulic Parameter Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Turbine converter controller. Different control strategies can be used [8], [9], [10] This first choice of modeling, theoretically ideal for its fidelity in modeling an architecture, naturally implies a significant calculation cost. Moreover, the lack of knowledge of the real integration characteristics of the architecture (measurements filtering e.g.…”
Section: A Matlab/simulink Instantaneous Modeling (Msim)mentioning
confidence: 99%