2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Phonation Time Normative Values Among Malaysians and Its Relation to Body Mass Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jitter is affected by the poor control of the vocal cord vibrations with depiction of the parameter of frequency variation from cycle-to-cycle, and shimmer is affected by the glottal resistance with relation to the amplitude variation of the sound wave, while NHR assesses the components that determine speech efficacy ( 11 ). MPT, on the other hand, measures the glottic efficiency ( 12 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jitter is affected by the poor control of the vocal cord vibrations with depiction of the parameter of frequency variation from cycle-to-cycle, and shimmer is affected by the glottal resistance with relation to the amplitude variation of the sound wave, while NHR assesses the components that determine speech efficacy ( 11 ). MPT, on the other hand, measures the glottic efficiency ( 12 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tools used to assess dysphonia severity include the maximum phonation time (MPT) and dysphonia severity index (DSI). The MPT evaluates the function of the vocal folds by holding /a/ vocalizations for as long as possible and measuring the duration [ 11 ]. The MPT evaluation reflects the severity of dysphonia by measuring how completely the vocal folds can be kept closed while maintaining a consistent pitch and volume during vocalization [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objective assessments are aerodynamic and acoustic analyses [ 9 ]. Simple aerodynamic assessments can be done by assessing the maximum phonation time [ 10 ], whereas acoustic analysis measures voice quality by feeding the recorded voices into an installed software [ 11 ]. Clinicians analyze the results of acoustic analysis according to the normal range identified for a certain population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%