1972
DOI: 10.1177/002224377200900206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Central-City Food Trading Areas

Abstract: A maximum likelihood estimate of the parameter in the Huff model of consumer store choice is derived and its properties are discussed. A method for obtaining a numerical value for the estimator is presented. The procedure is exemplified by estimating trading areas for food purchased for in-home consumption.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a retail context, locations can be selected to maximize the market share taken from competitors and to minimize self-cannibalization. The model is a special case of the Luce choice model (Haines et al, 1972). A large number of extensions have been developed for the Huff gravity model, include those that incorporate store image (Stanley and Sewall, 1976), elasticities of demand (Griffith, 1982), and social media location data (Lovelace et al, 2016).…”
Section: Geographic and Spatial Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a retail context, locations can be selected to maximize the market share taken from competitors and to minimize self-cannibalization. The model is a special case of the Luce choice model (Haines et al, 1972). A large number of extensions have been developed for the Huff gravity model, include those that incorporate store image (Stanley and Sewall, 1976), elasticities of demand (Griffith, 1982), and social media location data (Lovelace et al, 2016).…”
Section: Geographic and Spatial Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on spatial behavior based on gravity models has provided initial insights into this phenomenon by predicting a negative relationship between households' store patronage and distance to stores (Haines et al. 1972, Huff 1964).…”
Section: Theory Development and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, this variation may influence households' share of shopping expenditures at WC stores in relation to their share of travel costs allocated to the stores to make those expenditures. Research on spatial behavior based on gravity models has provided initial insights into this phenomenon by predicting a negative relationship between households' store patronage and distance to stores (Haines et al 1972, Huff 1964.…”
Section: Theory Development and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we focus on the Huff gravity model, which is widely used in retailing practice (Hernandez and Bennison, 2000) because of (1) its ease of use (Park et al, 2006;Lv et al, 2008;Ahn et al, 2009) and (2) the accuracy of its predictions (Drezner and Dressner, 2002), even though the two-variable specification is too parsimonious for policy purposes (Gautschi, 1981). Several empirical studies (Huff and Blue, 1966;Haines et al, 1972) support the usefulness of the Huff model in predicting the market share of shopping centres (Craig et al, 1984). In this model, the probability that customer i shops at location j depends upon two factors: the size of the store and the time it takes to travel to the store (Levy and Weitz, 2007).…”
Section: Previous Study and Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Travel time, or distance, is more important for convenience goods than shopping goods because consumers are less willing to travel a longer distance to buy a bottle of milk than a pair of new shoes. The calculation of λ has been discussed in previous studies (Huff and Blue, 1966;Haines et al, 1972). However, Japan and Korea have been using a fixed value of 2 for λ Table 2.…”
Section: Previous Study and Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%