2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2014.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Lebesgue extension of monotone convex functions

Abstract: Given a monotone convex function on the space of essentially bounded random variables with the Lebesgue property (order continuity), we consider its extension preserving the Lebesgue property to as big solid vector space of random variables as possible. We show that there exists a maximum such extension, with explicit construction, where the maximum domain of extension is obtained as a (possibly proper) subspace of a natural Orlicz-type space, characterized by a certain uniform integrability property. As an ap… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The form of our strong Cramér condition (3.1) was heavily inspired by the work of Owari [44] on continuous extensions of monotone convex functionals. In several cases of interest (namely, Propositions 4.1 and 5.3 below), it turns out that a converse to Lemma 3.1 is true, that is, the strong Cramér condition (3.1) is equivalent to the statement that ρ(λψ) < ∞ for all λ > 0.…”
Section: Cramér's Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The form of our strong Cramér condition (3.1) was heavily inspired by the work of Owari [44] on continuous extensions of monotone convex functionals. In several cases of interest (namely, Propositions 4.1 and 5.3 below), it turns out that a converse to Lemma 3.1 is true, that is, the strong Cramér condition (3.1) is equivalent to the statement that ρ(λψ) < ∞ for all λ > 0.…”
Section: Cramér's Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) follows from [27,Proposition 4.10], and (iv) is an immediate consequence of the monotonicity of ρ(| · |).…”
Section: 1 Construction Of the Minkowski Domain And Extension Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The latter means X c,R ≤ 1 2 < 1 for some c > 0, and thus H R ⊆ B. Finally, as (H R , · R ) is a Banach lattice and both η and ρR are convex, monotone and finite-valued on (H R , · R ), ρR| H R and η| H R are continuous according to Remark 2.4(v).From Proposition 4.9 we can derive the following characterisation of M R , a result which can also be found as[27, Lemma 3.3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…If the converse was also true, Theorem 1.1 would provide us an even nicer interpretation of the Lebesgue property as the Fatou property (easy to check) plus "something extra", with the "extra" being precisely specified. See [16,Theorem 3.9] for more discussion, where a characterization of Lebesgue property in the form of Theorem 1.1 is obtained under solely the Fatou property as the a priori assumption, but with the conjugate (ϕ| L ∞ ) * of the restriction to L ∞ of ϕ instead of ϕ * . The implication (1.8) ⇒ (1.3) for proper convex functions is indeed true for some good spaces X , but its validity in the generality of this paper is still open (to us).…”
Section: Introduction and The Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%