Maximizing Molecular Data From Low-Quality Fluid-Preserved Specimens in Natural History Collections

Abstract

Over the past decade, museum genomics studies have focused on obtaining DNA of sufficient quality and quantity for sequencing from fluid-preserved natural history specimens, primarily to be used in systematic studies. While these studies have opened windows to evolutionary and biodiversity knowledge of many species worldwide, published works often focus on the success of these DNA sequencing efforts, which is undoubtedly less common than obtaining minimal or sometimes no DNA or unusable sequence data from specimens in natural history collections. Here, we attempt to obtain and sequence DNA extracts from 115 fresh and 41 degraded samples of homalopsid snakes, as well as from two degraded samples of a poorly known snake, Hydrablabes periops. Hydrablabes has been suggested to belong to at least two different families (Natricidae and Homalopsidae) and with no fresh tissues known to be available, intractable museum specimens currently provide the only opportunity to determine this snake’s taxonomic affinity. Although our aim was to generate a target-capture dataset for these samples, to be included in a broader phylogenetic study, results were less than ideal due to large amounts of missing data, especially using the same downstream methods as with standard, high-quality samples. However, rather than discount results entirely, we used mapping methods with references and pseudoreferences, along with phylogenetic analyses, to maximize any usable molecular data from our sequencing efforts, identify the taxonomic affinity of H. periops, and compare sequencing success between fresh and degraded tissue samples. This resulted in largely complete mitochondrial genomes for five specimens and hundreds to thousands of nuclear loci (ultra-conserved loci, anchored-hybrid enrichment loci, and a variety of loci frequently used in squamate phylogenetic studies) from fluid-preserved snakes, including a specimen of H. periops from the Field Museum of Natural History collection. We combined our H. periops data with previously published genomic and Sanger-sequenced datasets to confirm the familial designation of this taxon, reject previous taxonomic hypotheses, and make biogeographic inferences for Hydrablabes. A second H. periops specimen, despite being seemingly similar for initial raw sequencing results and after being put through the same protocols, resulted in little usable molecular data. We discuss the successes and failures of using different pipelines and methods to maximize the products from these data and provide expectations for others who are looking to use DNA sequencing efforts on specimens that likely have degraded DNA.Life Science Identifier (Hydrablabes periops)urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F2AA44 E2-D2EF-4747-972A-652C34C2C09D.

Genomic analysis of Bornean geckos (Gekkonidae: Cyrtodactylus) reveals need for updated taxonomy

“…We recommend the most taxonomically conservative manner of doing so will be to use specimens from multiple localities across Kalimantan to identify a lineage that best matches the morphology of the type material. A more reliable, yet difficult and costly, option would involve extracting DNA from the holotype using methods that have proved successful for phylogenetic inferences from museum specimens (Bernstein & Ruane, 2022; Hykin et al, 2015; McGuire et al, 2018). Nonetheless, this process would not be done in vain as it would greatly enhance the systematics of Bornean Cyrtodactylus and provide a clear avenue for many new species to be recognised.…”

A new glassfrog species of the genus Centrolene (Amphibia, Anura, Centrolenidae) from Cordillera del Cóndor, southern Ecuador

“…Unfortunately, this could be a difficult task to accomplish, as the whole area is already a mining company´s concession and access is restricted. Another option would be to obtain sequences from the formalized holotype using alternative extracting methods from degraded DNA (e.g., Bernstein and Ruane 2022 ).…”

A new species of New Guinea Worm-Eating Snake (Serpentes, Elapidae, Toxicocalamus Boulenger, 1896) from Western Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea

“…This is important because six species of Toxicocalamus have not been included in DNA-based phylogenetic analyses: T. buergersi, T. cratermontanus, T. grandis, T. pumehanae, T. spilolepidotus, and T. longhagen. With the improvements of formalin-fixed tissue DNA extraction and next-generation sequencing, work is underway to expand phylogenetic analyses to include all Toxicocalamus species, including those represented only by formalin fixed vouchers (Ruane and Austin 2017;McGuire et al 2018;Hahn et al 2021;Ruane 2021;Bernstein and Ruane 2022;Roycroft et al 2022). Through construction of completely inclusive phylogenies, we hope to better understand the evolution of the many unique morphological and behavioral traits of New Guinea Worm-Eating snakes.…”