2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximizing data quality and shortening survey time: Three-form planned missing data survey design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a sample survey, data are collected from only a small part of the population unit. The survey was mostly carried out from a representative population sample [15]. The number of students is 143 students.…”
Section: Research Methods 21 Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a sample survey, data are collected from only a small part of the population unit. The survey was mostly carried out from a representative population sample [15]. The number of students is 143 students.…”
Section: Research Methods 21 Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiform design requires recruiting more participants than a complete data design where all items are administered to all participants. Moore et al (2020) recommended minimum sample size of 300 for the three-form design in cross-sectional studies. The sample size requirement is not surprising.…”
Section: Design Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables could include demographic variables, single indicator variables, important covariates, the item(s) that is most representative of key constructs, variables that are potential predictors for unplanned missingness, as well as items known to have unusual distributions (hence missing data on the items will be difficult to handle). However, a recent study argued that a simple assignment strategy that randomly assigns scale items to the X block along with demographics would work well if there are 13 or more items (Lang et al., 2020; Moore, Lang, & Grandfield, 2020). They referred to this approach as a random item assignment (RIA).…”
Section: Item Level Planned Missing Data Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Avoiding redundant (highly correlated) predictors in a regression equation and using measures with minimal measurement error (i.e., scales that produce scores considered valid and reliable) are just two of these ways (Lilienfeld & Strother, 2020). Using state of the art techniques to replace missing data to avoid deleting participants is strongly recommended (Little et al, 2014), as well as conducting planned missing data research designs to promote better quality data (Moore et al, 2020). Second, it should be acknowledged that increasing the sample size can make conducting a study more expensive and difficult and can have ethical implications.…”
Section: Limitations Conclusion and Research Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%