Smart Structures, Devices, and Systems II 2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.582278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximising microcantilever response: an analytical approach using mathematical models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By substituting equation (32) into equation (31), the following two equations are obtained which are separated in time and position (x,y) assuming constant plate stiffness, D(x,y) = D and plate thickness t(x) = t,…”
Section: Free Vibration Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By substituting equation (32) into equation (31), the following two equations are obtained which are separated in time and position (x,y) assuming constant plate stiffness, D(x,y) = D and plate thickness t(x) = t,…”
Section: Free Vibration Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the related studies are based on a simple lumped-parameters system modeling the biosensor using the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory [21][22][23]. The finite element method has been extensively implemented for numerically modeling MC based systems [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. It has emerged as a promising tool for estimating the geometry and bending stiffness of MCs [29], identifying the material and geometrical parameters of microstructures [30], verification of analytical models [31] and fabrication [32] of MCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analytical expressions for the deflection of non-prismatic beams can be obtained using the moment-area method [15], which has been used to model microcantilever dynamics earlier [16]. When a differential surface stress σ develops across the top and bottom faces of a prismatic cantilever, the bending moment is given by M = σ bh/2, where b is the width of the beam and h is its thickness [17,18].…”
Section: Modelling and Simulatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite Element Method (FEM) has been extensively implemented for numerically modeling MC based systems [4150]. It has emerged as a promising tool for estimating geometry and bending stiffness of MCs [46], identifying material and geometrical parameters of microstructures [47], verification of analytical models [48] and fabrication [49] of MCs. 3D dynamic behavior of an eight cantilever array structure was analyzed numerically by AFM showing good agreement in lower mode but not in higher modes [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%