2018
DOI: 10.1090/tran/7289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximal function characterizations for new local Hardy-type spaces on spaces of homogeneous type

Abstract: Abstract. Let X be a space of homogeneous type and let L be a nonnegative self-adjoint operator on L 2 (X) enjoying Gaussian estimates. The main aim of this paper is twofold. Firstly, we prove (local) nontangential and radial maximal function characterizations for the local Hardy spaces associated to L. This gives the maximal function characterization for local Hardy spaces in the sense of Coifman and Weiss provided that L satisfies certain extra conditions. Secondly we introduce local Hardy spaces associated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case that µ(X) < ∞, we have the following further conclusion. Similarly to the proof of Theorem 2.9 below, we find that, for any α ∈ (0, ∞), the local Musielak-Orlicz-Hardy spaces h φ, α ϕ, L, max (X) and h φ ϕ, L, rad (X) coincide with equivalent quasi-norms (see [15,Proposition 4.4] for the case that ϕ(x, t) := t p , with p ∈ (0, 1], for any x ∈ X and t ∈ [0, ∞)). Moreover, replacing the maximal function φ * L, α ( f ) by φ * L, α, loc ( f ) and repeating the proof of Theorem 1.8, we know that, for any q…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case that µ(X) < ∞, we have the following further conclusion. Similarly to the proof of Theorem 2.9 below, we find that, for any α ∈ (0, ∞), the local Musielak-Orlicz-Hardy spaces h φ, α ϕ, L, max (X) and h φ ϕ, L, rad (X) coincide with equivalent quasi-norms (see [15,Proposition 4.4] for the case that ϕ(x, t) := t p , with p ∈ (0, 1], for any x ∈ X and t ∈ [0, ∞)). Moreover, replacing the maximal function φ * L, α ( f ) by φ * L, α, loc ( f ) and repeating the proof of Theorem 1.8, we know that, for any q…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Examples of operators satisfying Assumptions 1.1 and 1.2 include both second-order selfadjoint elliptic operators in divergence form with bounded measurable coefficients and (degenerate) Schrödinger operators with non-negative potentials or with magnetic fields on R n or strongly Lipschitz domains, and Laplace-Beltrami operators on Heisenberg groups, connected and simply connected nilpotent Lie groups or complete Riemannian manifolds (see, for example, [4,14,15,28,71,74]). Now we describe the Musielak-Orlicz function considered in this article as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course X k (M ) ⊇ X k (M ), for h 1 (M ) properly contains H 1 (M ). It may be worth recalling that h 1 (M ) is the analogue on M of the classical space h 1 (R n ) introduced by D. Goldberg in [Go] and further investigated on specific measure metric spaces in various papers, including [HMY,YZ1,YZ2,BDL] (see also the references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2018, Bui et al. [6] obtained the maximal function characterizations of local Hardy spaces associated with some nonnegative self‐adjoint operator L . Recently, Bui et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%