2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00028-017-0398-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximal function characterizations for Hardy spaces associated with nonnegative self-adjoint operators on spaces of homogeneous type

Abstract: Abstract. Let X be a metric measure space with a doubling measure and L be a nonnegative selfadjoint operator acting on L 2 (X). Assume that L generates an analytic semigroup e −tL whose kernels p t (x, y) satisfy Gaussian upper bounds but without any assumptions on the regularity of space variables x and y. In this article we continue a study in [21] to give an atomic decomposition for the Hardy spaces H p L,max (X) in terms of the nontangential maximal function associated with the heat semigroup of L, and he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then prove a generalization of (2) and (3) to h (4) for 0 < p ≤ 1, which is the content of Theorem 2.4. This can be viewed as a local version of those in [38]. If one further assumes (A3) and (A4) then one can add h p at (X) to picture for n n+δ < p ≤ 1, which is the content of Theorem 2.7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We then prove a generalization of (2) and (3) to h (4) for 0 < p ≤ 1, which is the content of Theorem 2.4. This can be viewed as a local version of those in [38]. If one further assumes (A3) and (A4) then one can add h p at (X) to picture for n n+δ < p ≤ 1, which is the content of Theorem 2.7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one further assumes (A3) and (A4) then one can add h p at (X) to picture for n n+δ < p ≤ 1, which is the content of Theorem 2.7. We remark that the ideas in the proof of Theorem 2.4 rely on the innovations in [38], although some significant modifications are needed, not least of which the development of an inhomogeneous Calderón reproducing formula (Proposition 3.6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 6.2. We should note that the equivalency of the radial maximal function characterization and the nontangential maximal function characterizations of H 1 L (R n ) have been obtained in [40,36]. Our Theorem 6.1 provides a different proof by using the frame decomposition.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…A maximal function characterization of H 1 L (R n ) In this section, we continue the discussion from Section 4 regarding a characterization of the Hardy space H 1 L (R n ) in terms of radial maximal function under the following conditions: (H1) ′ L is a second order non-negative self-adjoint operator on L 2 (R n ); (H2) ′ The kernel of e −tL , denoted by p t (x, y), is a measurable function on R n × R n and satisfies a Gaussian upper bound, that is p t (x, y) ≤ Ct −n/2 exp − |x − y| 2 ct for all t > 0, and x, y ∈ R n , where C and c are positive constants. The space H 1 L (R n ) involves some different characterizations, see for examples, [2,18,19,22,27,28,29,35,36,40]. If an operator L satisfies conditions (H1) ′ and (H2) ′ , then for any M ≥ 1, 1 < q ≤ ∞, Define the spaces H 1 L,max (R n ) as the completion of L 2 (R n ) in the norms given by the L 1 (R n ) norm of the maximal function, i.e., f H 1 L,max (R n ) = f + h L 1 (R n ) .…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation