Maxillary tooth transposition: Correct or accept?

Ciarlantini, Roberto; Melsen, Birte

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.011

Cited by 43 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, present findings suggest a higher prevalence in male subjects. Peck and Peck [23] suggest that transposition equally affects both sexes, while others, similar to our findings, have found a higher prevalence in males [24]. The higher prevalence of tooth transpositions could be partially explained by a higher proportion of these cases detected in the 8 and 9 year-old groups (~69%) and it was possible that some of these cases normalized later on and did not present the tooth transpositions.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Dental anomalies: prevalence and associations between them in a large sample of non-orthodontic subjects, a cross-sectional study

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundTo analyze the prevalence and associations between dental anomalies detectable on panoramic radiographs in a sample of non-orthodontic growing subjects.MethodsFor this cross-sectional study, digital panoramic radiographs of 5005 subjects were initially screened from a single radiographic center in Rome. Inclusion criteria were: subjects who were aged 8–12 years, Caucasian, and had good diagnostic quality radiographs. Syndromic subjects, those with craniofacial malformation, or orthodontic patients were excluded and this led to a sample of 4706 subjects [mean (SD) age = 9.6 (1.2) years, 2366 males and 2340 females]. Sample was subsequently divided into four subgroups (8, 9, 10, and 11–12 year-old groups). Two operators examined panoramic radiographs to observe the presence of common dental anomalies. The prevalence and associations between dental anomalies were also investigated.ResultsThe overall prevalence of dental anomalies was 20.9%. Approximately, 17.9% showed only one anomaly, 2.7% two anomalies, while only 0.3% had more than two anomalies. The most frequent anomalies were the displacement of maxillary canine (7.5%), hypodontia (7.1%), impacted teeth (3.9%), tooth ankylosis (2.8%), and tooth transposition (1.4%). The lower right second premolar was the most frequent missing teeth; 3.7% had only one tooth agenesis, and 0.08% had six or more missing tooth (Oligodontia). Mesiodens was the most common type of supernumerary tooth (0.66%). Two subjects had taurodontic tooth (0.04%). Tooth transpositions and displacement of maxillary canine were seen in 1.4 and 7.5%, retrospectively (approximately 69 and 58% were in the 8 and 9 year-old groups, retrospectively). Significant associations were detected between the different dental anomalies (P < .05).ConclusionsThe results of our study revealed significant associations among different dental anomalies and provide further evidences to support common etiological factors.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0352-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Dental anomalies: prevalence and associations between them in a large sample of non-orthodontic subjects, a cross-sectional study

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…6 However, moving two teeth into the alveolar process to switch their positions is difficult, risky, and time consuming. 6,17,19 In fact, the risk of root resorption and periodontal recession is quite high, 6,17 since in most of the cases there isn't enough space in the alveolar process to contain two teeth moving in opposite directions, and this must be balanced with the possible benefits of such treatment. Keeping the transposition is an option widely approved by many authors 6,8,17,20,21 and was chosen for this case because of the fewer contraindications and side effects associated with this choice, the minor treatment time, and the simpler and more predictable mechanics.…”

Section: Second Phase Of Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…their transposed positions; or to extract one of the teeth. 17 Since there was no space deficiency or need for a sagittal correction, extractions were not considered suitable for this case.…”

Section: Second Phase Of Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maxillary canine–first premolar bilateral transposition in a Class III patient: A case report

Potrubacz

Tepedino

Chimenti

2016

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tooth transposition is a rare dental anomaly that often represents a challenge for the clinician. The case of a girl with skeletal Class III malocclusion and concomitant maxillary canine-first premolar bilateral transposition, followed from 7 to 17 years of age, is presented. After a first phase of treatment aimed at resolving the Class III malocclusion, the transposition was maintained and the case finalized with a multibracket appliance. (Angle Orthod. 2016;86:509-519.)

show abstract

“…Tedavi başında ise transpoze dişle-rin kök ucu pozisyonu ve gelişim dönemi, diş morfolojisi, fasial estetik ve çevresindeki kemik dokusu ayrıca incelenmelidir. 3,4,10,12,13 Diş transpozisyon vakalarının ortodontik tedavisinde farklı seçenekler bulunmaktadır. Bu tedavi seçeneklerini, altı sekiz yaş grubunda gelişen diş transpozisyonunun erken teşhisinde uygulanabilen koruyucu tedaviler, transpoze dişlerin ortodontik diş hareketleriyle birlikte diş arkındaki doğru anatomik pozisyonlarına getirilmesi 3,4,6,[13][14][15][16] ve etkilenen dişlerin transpoze konumlarında bı-rakılarak ortodontik tedavi sonrasında konservatif restorasyonlarla kronlarının yeniden şekillendirilmesi oluşturmaktadır.…”

unclassified

“…3,4,10,12,13 Diş transpozisyon vakalarının ortodontik tedavisinde farklı seçenekler bulunmaktadır. Bu tedavi seçeneklerini, altı sekiz yaş grubunda gelişen diş transpozisyonunun erken teşhisinde uygulanabilen koruyucu tedaviler, transpoze dişlerin ortodontik diş hareketleriyle birlikte diş arkındaki doğru anatomik pozisyonlarına getirilmesi 3,4,6,[13][14][15][16] ve etkilenen dişlerin transpoze konumlarında bı-rakılarak ortodontik tedavi sonrasında konservatif restorasyonlarla kronlarının yeniden şekillendirilmesi oluşturmaktadır. 3,4,6,13,15,16 Estetik ve fonksiyon açısından ideal ortodontik tedavi sonuçlarının elde edilebilmesi için transpoze dişlerin kendi anatomik konumlarına alınma-ları tavsiye edilmektedir.…”

unclassified

Non-Extraction Fixed Orthodontic Treatment Approach of Maxillary Lateral Incisor-Canine Transposition: Case Report

Alkan¹,

Kaya²

2015

Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci Cases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maxillary tooth transposition: Correct or accept?

Cited by 43 publications

References 29 publications

Dental anomalies: prevalence and associations between them in a large sample of non-orthodontic subjects, a cross-sectional study

Dental anomalies: prevalence and associations between them in a large sample of non-orthodontic subjects, a cross-sectional study

Maxillary canine–first premolar bilateral transposition in a Class III patient: A case report

Non-Extraction Fixed Orthodontic Treatment Approach of Maxillary Lateral Incisor-Canine Transposition: Case Report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About