2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maxillary second molar with 5 roots and 5 canals evaluated using cone beam computerized tomography: a case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The researchers [11] with three buccal roots. Kottoor et al [12] reported a maxillary second molar with five roots and five canals. To date, however, no one has reported the existence of three canals in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary second molar in Xibo minority using multi-slice computed topography (CT) in endodontic therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers [11] with three buccal roots. Kottoor et al [12] reported a maxillary second molar with five roots and five canals. To date, however, no one has reported the existence of three canals in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary second molar in Xibo minority using multi-slice computed topography (CT) in endodontic therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] Knowledge of anatomical variations and abnormalities frequently observed in this region together with radiographs taken from different angles and a CBCT study can aid detection. [14] In cases where radiography fails to determine the presence of extra canals, a careful analysis of developmental grooves in the pulpal chamber base by the dentist can aid detection of such canals. [15] Vertucci [16] recommended evaluating the base and walls of the pulpal chamber when the number of existing root canals could not be accurately determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KIBT ise çevre dokuların engellemesi olmaksızın hedef dokunun gö-rüntülerini net olarak elde etmektedir. 17 Ancak KIBT bu avantajlarının yanı sıra aynı bölgeden birden fazla sayıda kesit ve görüntü alınması nedeni ile alınan radyasyon miktarının yüksek olması, yöntemin pahalı olması ve her merkezde bulunmaması, kesitlerden daha uzakta olan lezyonların atlanabilmesi, metalik yabancı cisimler (protezler, metalik restorasyonlar), görüntüde bozulma (artefakt) oluşturması, doku spesifisitesini tayin etmedeki yetersizliği, solid bir kitlenin benign veya malign olup olmadığının ayrımını yapılamaması gibi dezavantajlara da sahiptir. Çalışmamızda Olgu 1 ve Olgu 2'de PT'nin anatomik incelenmesi ve kök kanal konfigürasyonunun değer-lendirilmesi KIBT ile yapılmıştır.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified