2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017gl075367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAVEN Observations of the Effects of Crustal Magnetic Fields on Electron Density and Temperature in the Martian Dayside Ionosphere

Abstract: Mars lacks a global magnetic field but possesses concentrated regions of crustal magnetic field that influence the planet's interaction with the solar wind and the structure of the Martian ionosphere. In this study we survey 17 months of MAVEN Langmuir Probe and Waves dayside electron density and temperature measurements to study how these quantities are affected in regions with strong crustal magnetic fields. Above 200 km altitude, we find that regions of strong crustal magnetic fields feature cooler electron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
48
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
14
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation of enhanced neutral temperature was reported by Cui et al (2018) with the aid of the NGIMS data acquired during several DD campaigns (see also Leblanc et al 2006), but these authors argued that photoelectron trapping was unlikely to be a viable mechanism since the difference in photoelectron impact heating between regions with and without strong crustal magnetic fields was far insufficient to account for the difference in neutral temperature. Meanwhile, Flynn et al (2017) showed that regions over magnetic anomalies featured low electron temperatures, in contrast to our ideal expectation. According to Xu et al (2017), the magnetic field configuration throughout the entire atmospheric regions of interest here is dominated by closed field lines (see their Figure 8), indicating that photoelectrons are always trapped at these altitudes irrespective of the magnetic field strength.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The observation of enhanced neutral temperature was reported by Cui et al (2018) with the aid of the NGIMS data acquired during several DD campaigns (see also Leblanc et al 2006), but these authors argued that photoelectron trapping was unlikely to be a viable mechanism since the difference in photoelectron impact heating between regions with and without strong crustal magnetic fields was far insufficient to account for the difference in neutral temperature. Meanwhile, Flynn et al (2017) showed that regions over magnetic anomalies featured low electron temperatures, in contrast to our ideal expectation. According to Xu et al (2017), the magnetic field configuration throughout the entire atmospheric regions of interest here is dominated by closed field lines (see their Figure 8), indicating that photoelectrons are always trapped at these altitudes irrespective of the magnetic field strength.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…In the current paper, based on MAVEN data analysis, we show that the reason why the current models cannot accurately predict electron temperature in the high altitude of crustal‐field region is the neglect of kinetic effects, such as the magnetic mirror force and ambipolar electric field, on electron heat transport in the presence of crustal fields. The current paper also confirms the Flynn et al () conclusion just stated.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In both cases the magnetic field provides good connectivity between high and low altitudes in the ionosphere, that is, between ~100‐ and 500‐km altitudes, in comparison with the largely horizontal fields, namely, the draped magnetic field of solar wind origin (Bertucci et al, ; Brain et al, ). Flynn et al () showed that the electron density is higher (e.g., Andrews et al, , ) and temperature is lower in the dayside ionosphere of the crustal‐field regions above 200 km. They qualitatively anticipated that processes associated with plasma transport lead to the observed anticorrelation of electron densities and temperature in the crustal‐field region at Mars (e.g., Schunk & Nagy, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, the data from the MAVEN nominal science orbits may not be very useful since the impact of magnetic field is likely manifest at altitudes below their periapses. This is in contrast to the recent finding that a similar impact on electron temperature is manifest above 200km (Flynn et al 2017). …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%