2018
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aabcc6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionization Efficiency in the Dayside Martian Upper Atmosphere

Abstract: Combining the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution measurements of neutral atmospheric density, solar EUV/X-ray flux, and differential photoelectron intensity made during 240 nominal orbits, we calculate the ionization efficiency, defined as the ratio of the secondary (photoelectron impact) ionization rate to the primary (photon impact) ionization rate, in the dayside Martian upper atmosphere under a range of solar illumination conditions. Both the CO 2 and O ionization efficiencies tend to be constant from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The available EUVM data reveal near identical median solar EUV/X‐ray spectra for the four different cases of geophysical condition (not shown), implying that the case‐to‐case variability in the photoionization rate is primarily contributed by the variability in the background neutral atmosphere. Analogous to Cui, Wu, et al (), we calculate the photoionization rate along each MAVEN orbit using both the NGIMS neutral density data (Mahaffy et al, ) and the EUVM solar spectral model (Thiemann et al, ). The spherical nature of the atmosphere is taken into full account (Smith & Smith, ).…”
Section: Implications On Plasma Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available EUVM data reveal near identical median solar EUV/X‐ray spectra for the four different cases of geophysical condition (not shown), implying that the case‐to‐case variability in the photoionization rate is primarily contributed by the variability in the background neutral atmosphere. Analogous to Cui, Wu, et al (), we calculate the photoionization rate along each MAVEN orbit using both the NGIMS neutral density data (Mahaffy et al, ) and the EUVM solar spectral model (Thiemann et al, ). The spherical nature of the atmosphere is taken into full account (Smith & Smith, ).…”
Section: Implications On Plasma Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a closer look, we compare in Figure the energy distributions of these rates at two representative altitudes: 160 km near the periapsis (panel a) and 200 km (panel b). Both panels suggest that the contribution of secondary ionization is of minor importance, consistent with the relatively small ionization efficiency reported by Cui J et al () also based on the MAVEN data. For the two photoelectron loss processes, the relative importance of Coulomb collisions clearly increases with decreasing photoelectron energy.…”
Section: Photoelectron Balance During Maven Orbit No 2909mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, as electrons and low‐energy ions are magnetized above the collisional atmosphere, magnetic topology is important for characterizing energetic electron precipitation and low‐energy ion escape. More specifically, solar wind electrons and solar energetic particle electrons can precipitate along open field lines (e.g., Dubinin, Fraenz, Woch, Winnigham, et al, ; Dubinin, Fraenz, Woch, Roussos, et al, ; Lillis & Brain, ; Lillis et al, , , ; Xu et al, ), and ionospheric photoelectrons can precipitate onto the nightside atmosphere along cross‐terminator closed field lines (e.g., Liemohn et al, ; Ulusen et al, ; Xu, Mitchell, et al, ; Xu, Mitchell, Liemohn, et al, ), causing heating (e.g., Fox & Dalgarno, ; Sakai et al, ), ionization (e.g., Adams et al, ; Cui et al, ; Fillingim et al, , ; Xu, Mitchell, et al, ), and auroral emission (e.g., Bertaux et al, ; Brain et al, ; Haider et al, ; Leblanc et al, , ; Schneider et al, , ; Seth et al, ; Shane et al, ). At the same time, low‐energy ions can escape along open field lines (e.g., Ergun et al, ; Jakosky et al, ), accelerated partly by ambipolar electric fields (e.g., Collinson et al, ; Xu, Mitchell, et al, ), and on draped field lines through the J × B force and/or the convection electric field (e.g., Cravens et al, ; Fang et al, ; Halekas, Brain, et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%