2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix-matched standards in the liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry determination of neonicotinoids in soil and sediment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparisons between this proposed method and other analytical techniques for the analysis of neonicotinoid pesticides from the viewpoint of extraction solvent, LOD, and linear range were listed in Table S3. As can be seen, the extraction procedures reported were the same with LODs between 0.07 and 3.4 μg/kg, which were as low as those obtained with this proposed extraction method (between 0.2 and 0.5 μg/kg) [35][36][37][38]. These results showed that this ethanol-based QuEChERS method performed equally well in terms of these parameters for neonicotinoid pesticide residues.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The comparisons between this proposed method and other analytical techniques for the analysis of neonicotinoid pesticides from the viewpoint of extraction solvent, LOD, and linear range were listed in Table S3. As can be seen, the extraction procedures reported were the same with LODs between 0.07 and 3.4 μg/kg, which were as low as those obtained with this proposed extraction method (between 0.2 and 0.5 μg/kg) [35][36][37][38]. These results showed that this ethanol-based QuEChERS method performed equally well in terms of these parameters for neonicotinoid pesticide residues.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Wildflower and bee samples were extracted based on a protocol outlined by McManus et al (2019), with modifications adjusting for sample mass. Bees were homogenized in the 20-ml vial in which they were collected, along with 3 ml of water:acetonitrile (33:66).…”
Section: Agrochemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now there are three main compared versions, one based on the original unbuffered method, and the other two used buffering agent to ensure more efficient extractions of pH-dependent analytes as well as less degradation of labile analytes [15]. However, the strong matrix interference may cause a lack of selectivity towards target compounds, so it's an imperative of further cleanup steps by utilizing sorbents such as C 18 , primary secondary amine (PSA) and graphitized carbon black (GCB) [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%