2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix effect studies with empirical formulations in maize saplings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the present eDXRF method is less laborious as compared to the preconcentration techniques employed for liquid analysis which increase the time required for analysis and may also involve risks of contamination [3]. Moreover, the methodology adopted has the advantage that it can also account for compensation of matrix effects [14] which disturb the linearity between the concentration of an element and its intensity. So, it can be concluded that the approach followed can be efficiently exploited for similar studies in liquids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the present eDXRF method is less laborious as compared to the preconcentration techniques employed for liquid analysis which increase the time required for analysis and may also involve risks of contamination [3]. Moreover, the methodology adopted has the advantage that it can also account for compensation of matrix effects [14] which disturb the linearity between the concentration of an element and its intensity. So, it can be concluded that the approach followed can be efficiently exploited for similar studies in liquids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorption terms were empirically related to the determined analyte amounts irrespective of its X-ray counts. Similarly, the enhancement terms for the analyte were empirically related, in turn, with the analyte amount and with enhancer amount [12]. For a specific category of substrate, these relations give absorption and enhancement terms direct from the known amounts of analyte and enhancer elements or vice versa i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%