1989
DOI: 10.1002/xrs.1300180505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix corrections for quantitative determination of trace elements in biological samples using energy‐dispersive X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry

Abstract: An experimental method for the evaluation of the matrix absorption correction (8) for the determination of trace elements in thick biological samples using EDXRF is discussed. The validity of the method was checked in two ways, first by comparing the experimental values with theoretical estimated values for samples of known matrix and second by analysing NBS biological standards in the form of thick pellets. It was found that a sample thickness of 40-70 mg is, in general, optimum for the analysis of biological… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The instrumental detection limit [14] of our system is about 800 ppm at an energy of 5.84 keV. The method of micro-radiographic analysis [15,16] using the tables in Ref. [17] for the mass absorption coefficients of Eu, In, and O were used in the determination of x.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrumental detection limit [14] of our system is about 800 ppm at an energy of 5.84 keV. The method of micro-radiographic analysis [15,16] using the tables in Ref. [17] for the mass absorption coefficients of Eu, In, and O were used in the determination of x.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A value ofˇD 0.21 corresponds to 99% absorption. 20 The mass attenuation coefficients , used in evaluation ofˇ Lp , were taken from Chantler. 21 The energy of the inelastic scattered peak in the spectrum of Cu target was used to deduce the incident angles as 34 and 56°in the experimental arrangements for the secondary and direct excitation modes, respectively.…”
Section: Evaluation Procedures L X-ray Production Cross-sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of standards prepared in the laboratory with commercially available pure elements or compounds has been shown to be efficient for the determination of the elemental sensitivity in XRF systems because they are inexpensive and can be easily prepared. To correct for the absorption effects, 13,14 an Am-241 radioactive source (non-sealed) was used. The relationship between the mass absorption coefficient M of the matrix and the x-ray energy E for the different elements is given by 12…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%