Proceedings of SPE/AAPG Western Regional Meeting 2000
DOI: 10.2523/62825-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix Acidizing of Water Injectors in a Sandstone Field in Saudi Arabia: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because of potential precipitation of potassium fluoborate which may damage the formation. 15 Clay minerals in the bulk sample ranged from 0.13 to 6.9 wt%. The clay fraction was separated from the bulk sample and analyzed by XRD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because of potential precipitation of potassium fluoborate which may damage the formation. 15 Clay minerals in the bulk sample ranged from 0.13 to 6.9 wt%. The clay fraction was separated from the bulk sample and analyzed by XRD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, environmental concerns and difficulties to achieve the desired fracture length and orientation may discourage hydraulic fracturing [7]. In most cases, matrix acidizing could be challenging to implement in clay rich sandstone formations due to the complex reactions between hydrofluoric acid (HF) and the rock minerals (silicates, feldspars, and chlorites) and the damage that may occur by secondary precipitation particularly at high temperatures [8,9]. In view of the above, we studied an alternative stimulation technology to improve water injectivity in tight and clay rich sandstone reservoir with the application of electrokinetic potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%