In concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) system, the uniformity of sun light on the PV module mainly proposed with optical parameters like concentration ratio, optical angles, focal shape and uniform heat flux dissipation on PV module. The non-uniformity of sun light focusing on PV module introduce the ohmic losses in between the cell layers and it affects the rate of flow charge carriers movement. In high CPV system above 100 Suns, an effective tracking and thermal management schemes are essential for uniform power collection throughout the year. The continuous tracking system possesses a moving part that results in an increased maintenance costs for the system life. For the better heat dissipation on PV module, a separate active or passive cooling system is essential to ensure adequate performance. The shading is another challenge in flat plate and concentrated photo voltaic power plants. Single shaded solar cells are creating more impact with the overall energy yield. In CPV system the reflector mirrors were produce some near shading effect on the PV module causes by sun path and optical geometry of concentrator system. Hence, in this research work, all-inclusive concerns/limitations were addressed by using a linear ridge concentrator PV system with 1-Sun and 2-Sun concentration. The whole tracking mechanism of system can be reduced into single axis monthly tracking with manual mode. The geometrical ray tracing analysis of the ridge concentrator system was carried out using Trace-pro ray simulation. The annual near shading analysis caused by the reflectors mirrors were carried out with East-West and North-South tracking mode using PV system simulation tool. The shading losses like beam liner loss, module loss and monthly shading factors are also calculated using the same tool. The temperature of the PV module reduced using Silica mesoporous coated reflector as heat sink. The 38%, 58%, and 31% of the total cell area was affected by shade in 1-Sun concentrator for the months of November, December and January, respectively. The increments in output power gain were up to 11.5%, 24.3%, 19.2%, and 48.89% for 1-Sun, 2-Sun, 1-Sun with Tilt and 2-Sun with tilt respectively compared with a reference PV module. Efficiency improvements observed for 1-Sun, 2-Sun,